Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Bettman wished to clarify, regarding AlS page 250, that the note at the bottom of the page <br />marked (a) should say 'fees' and not 'rates.' <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly asked what was meant by 'reimbursable overtime revenue' for the Eugene Police <br />Department (EPD). Police Chief Bob Lehner replied it meant that the staff time was completely <br />reimbursable from an outside source. He explained that two-thirds of the reimbursable overtime revenues <br />received came from the University of Oregon, which often utilized City Police services for its events. He <br />said the officers were paid through the City payroll and the City billed the hiring entity. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly asked, regarding the risk fund listed on AIS page 254, what the transfer of $1 million was <br />from the balance available to the budget for Central Services Department and how that '~jibed" with the <br />transfer six months earlier of $1.8 million out of the General Fund and into the Risk Fund to make its <br />balance available in better shape. Ms. Murdoch responded that the balance available account was the <br />flexibility for spending in the fund. She said the reason to have such a balance was to be prepared for <br />unforeseen costs. She explained that the adjustment earlier in the year that he referred to did increase the <br />balance available in that fund because the City had expected at that time to have high future liability costs, <br />but staff was unsure of the amount. In fact, she said the actuary had provided an estimate that had increased <br />the claims payable account and the City needed to use the money requested to be moved from Balance <br />Available in this supplemental budget item to "book into" claims payable expense for FY05. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly expressed concern that this would turn into an "overly gyrating fund situation." He said it <br />would not surprise him to see in the Supplemental Budget (SB) # 1 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 that yet another <br />transfer from the General Fund would be required. He understood that risk costs were innately <br />unpredictable, but he hoped the City could begin to develop a strategy to avoid such frequent transfers back <br />and forth. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap6 asked if the City was $2.8 million off in its estimates for the risk fund at the start of the <br />year. Ms. Murdoch replied that the claims payable increased $1.7 million more than the actuary's previous <br />estimate. <br /> <br />In response to another question from Councilor Pap6, Ms. Murdoch clarified that the $1.445 million listed <br />on page 252 was not City money but rather was money the City collected for the Metropolitan Wastewater <br />Management Commission (MWMC). Councilor Pap6 asked if they could use the money for either capital or <br />expenditures. Public Works Department Director Kurt Corey stated that it was operating funding and <br />represented additional revenues that came in since the rate adjustment for FY05 had occurred. He <br />underscored that it was not a windfall to the MWMC, but a planned increase that was approved after the <br />adoption of the FY05 Budget. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling said as a member of the MWMC he would look into whether this amount was included in <br />the MWMC budget. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap~ asked what the $184,000 going into the Airport Fund represented. Mr. Corey replied it <br />represented that during the course of the fiscal year the parking concession agreement had been rewritten <br />and had resulted in additional revenues that had to be recognized and appropriated in the FY05 budget. <br />Councilor Pap~ observed that the money was listed as going into Public Works. Mr. Corey responded that <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 13, 2005 Page 10 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />