My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 06/13/05 Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2005
>
CC Minutes - 06/13/05 Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:29:17 AM
Creation date
7/22/2005 8:44:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilor Kelly said he was a "long way" from being able to support the amendment. He thought it <br />important to look at the panoply of requests and determine which ones deserved funding. He was <br />"dumbfounded" that the proposal had not been brought to the Budget Committee. He agreed that it was an <br />important program in tough financial straits, but he averred one could say this about many youth-oriented <br />programs in the community. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor opposed the amendment. She cited a number of items that were not being funded or <br />funded adequately, such as the Sister Cities Program and various arts programs. She wished to give money <br />to Community Television, which provided opportunities for youth as well, but was not able to do so. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Bettman, Ms. Jones said she received requests for funding from <br />various arts organizations, one of which did receive some money through the budget process, and the <br />YMCA, among others. Councilor Bettman noted that Arts Umbrella did not receive funding though she <br />considered it a worthy endeavor as it provided many scholarships and taught music to young people. She <br />cited the Whiteaker School which contained a school for autistic children and did not have air conditioning, <br />though it taught through the summer. She opined that Kidsports was not a "faltering program" and that <br />there was a certain inequity and unfairness in bringing this amendment forward at this point. She asked how <br />the citizen Budget Committee members would feel knowing that they did not have an opportunity to present <br />one "worthy entity" or another. She felt that '~just because the executive director of the program happened <br />to be well-connected" he was able to circumvent the process. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon could not argue with any councilors about the process. She wished to point out that she <br />did not receive any emails from Mr. Torrey until nearly the end of the budget process and she was not <br />approached with a figure until after the process was over. She noted that there was unanimous agreement <br />that the program was important and that it had been in the community for a long time, provided memorable <br />experiences, and had taught skills to the City's youth. She stressed that Kidsports was in a big transition <br />period. She averred the program had to repackage itself and had a "great core of folks" taking a hard look <br />at the organization to enable it to move forward. She felt the City's partnership in the process was very <br />important. She pointed out that scholarships were a large part of the Kidsports program and that many of <br />those children receiving such scholarships lived in her ward. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling observed that the City had been giving $42,000 for years. He underscored that costs had <br />increased over the years and, with the friendly amendment, the additional $36,000 was a one-time <br />expenditure. He thought it was a worthwhile investment and was inclined to support it primarily because of <br />the "overall good" that Kidsports did throughout the community. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed, 5:3; councilors Kelly, Bettman, and Taylor voting in <br /> opposition. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly conveyed his displeasure with the vote. He hoped the supporters of the amendment would <br />be able to explain to the arts programs why they did not receive a share of the funding. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap6 expressed appreciation for the deliberation of the Budget Committee. He called it a '~tough <br />one." He felt steps were being taken to improve public safety with the funding to reinstitute full services of <br />Fire Station #9 and funding for EPD foot and bicycle patrols. He acknowledged that Police Chief Lehner <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 13, 2005 Page 15 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.