My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AMENDED 2 Agenda Packet 3-11-19 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2019
>
03-11-19
>
AMENDED 2 Agenda Packet 3-11-19 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2019 4:18:49 PM
Creation date
3/8/2019 4:10:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Meeting
City_Council_Meeting_Date
3/11/2019
City_Council_Effective_Date
3/11/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit C <br />Planning Director’s Findings and Recommendation <br />Annexation Request for Morrow/Thomas <br />(City File: A 18-11) <br /> <br />Application Submitted: December 21, 2018 <br />Applicant: Randall Morrow and Denise Thomas <br />Property Included in Annexation Request: Tax Lot 3300 of Assessor’s Map 17-04-24-32 and portion of <br />Sunnyside Drive <br />Zoning: R-1 Low-Density Residential with /UL Urbanizable Land Overlay <br />Location: 503 Sunnyside Drive, north side of Sunnyside Drive and west of River Road <br />Representative: Lloyd Tolbert, L.S.; Tolbert Associates <br />Lead City Staff: Rodney Bohner, City of Eugene Planning Division, 541-682-5437 <br /> <br />EVALULATION: <br />Based on the information provided by the applicant, the City has determined that this request complies <br />with Eugene Code (EC) Section 9.7805 Annexation - Applicability. As such, it is subject to review and <br />approval in accordance with the requirements, application criteria and procedures of EC 9.7800 through <br />9.7835. The applicable approval criteria are presented below in bold typeface with findings and <br />conclusions following each. <br /> <br />EC 9.7825(1) The land proposed to be annexed is within the city’s urban growth boundary and is: <br /> (a) Contiguous to the city limits; or <br /> (b) Separated from the city only by a public right of way or a stream, bay, lake or other <br />body of water. <br />Complies Findings: The annexation area is within the City’s urban growth boundary (UGB), and is <br />contiguous to the City limits, consistent with subsection (a). <br />YES <br /> NO <br />EC 9.7825(2) The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in <br />any applicable refinement plans. <br />Complies Findings: Several policies from the Metro Plan provide support for this annexation by <br />encouraging compact urban growth to achieve efficient use of land and urban service <br />provisions within the UGB, including the following policies from the Growth <br />Management section (in italic text): <br /> <br />Policy 8. Land within the UGB may be converted from urbanizable to urban only <br /> through annexation to a city when it is found that: <br />a. A minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be provided to the <br />area in an orderly and efficient manner. <br />b. There will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services <br />and facilities. Conversion of urbanizable land to urban shall also be <br />consistent with the Metro Plan. (page II-C-4) <br /> <br />Policy 10. Annexation to a city through normal processes shall continue to be the <br />highest priority. (page II-C-5). <br />YES <br /> NO <br />March 11, 2019, Meeting – Item 3D
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.