Laserfiche WebLink
mistakenly left out of the code~ reiterating i n an additional section that the City processes requests <br />for modification of a Willamette Greenway Permit using a Type II process. <br /> <br />Goals ] ~ r l 9~ Estuarir~e Resource& Coastal Shoreland& Beaches and Dunes, and Ocean resources. <br />These Storewide Planning Goals do not apply to the actions taken. <br /> <br />(2) Is consistent with applicable pro¥isions of the Metro Plan and applicable adopted <br /> refinement plans. <br /> <br />Metro Plan Policies <br /> <br />~sidential Land Use and Hous~ Element, Polic~_A 13. Increase overall residential density in the <br />metrOPolitan area by creating more opportunities for effectively designed #~-fiII, redevelopment~ and <br />mixed use while considering impacts of increased residential density on historic, existing andJhture <br />neighborhoods. <br /> <br />The ordinance concerning land use regulations includes a change to make it possible to establish a <br />one-family dwelling in C~1 or C~2 if it is above a nonresidential use on the ground floor. This is <br />consistent with the intent of Policy A. 13 since it promotes the mixing of commercial and residential <br />uses. <br /> <br />The ordinance concerning nodal development includes in the purpose of the /ND Nodal <br />Development overlay zone a statement that each node is intended to achieve an average overall <br />residential density of 12 units per net residential acre. The amendments in this ordinance related to <br />minimum residential densities for different base zones exceed those set forth in the Land Use Code, <br />consistent with the intent to achieve an average of 12 units per net residential acre. This is <br />consistent with Policy A. 13 to increase overall residential densities. <br /> <br />The ordinance concerning secondary dwellings and flag tots will create additional opportunities for <br />residential in-fill development by decreasing required setbacks for flag tots and increasing the <br />allowance of detached secondary dwellings. To promote compatibility with existingneighborhoods, <br />new builchngs on flag lots will still have greater setbacks than a standard lot and special design <br />standards remain in place for detached secondary dwellings, <br /> <br />Econ~v? Elem~ ?olicy 23, Provide for limited mixing of o~fice, commercial~ and industrial uses <br />under proced2~res which clearly define the conditions under which such uses shall be permitted and <br />which: (a) preserve the suitability of the affected areas ~br their primary uses; (b) assure <br />compatibility; and ( c) consider the potential for increased traffic congestion. <br /> <br />Ordinance No. 1 amendments include a change to make it possible to establish a one-family dwelling <br />or two-family dwelling m C-1 or C-2 if it is above a nonresidential use on the ground floor. These <br />residences are also sub~iect to the limitations in EC 9.2161(6). These limitations on residential uses <br />preserve the suitability of the C-1 and C-2 zones for commercial uses and take into account <br />compatibility and traffic issues. <br /> <br />Exhibit A - 5 <br /> <br /> <br />