Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit C <br />Planning Directors Findings and Recommendation <br />Annexation Request for LH Fund 3 <br />(City File: A 18-8) <br />Application Submitted: September 27, 2018 <br />(a) Contiguous to the city limits; or <br />Applicant: LH Fund 3, LLC <br />body ofwater. <br />Property Included in Annexation Rel Tae Lots 2900&3000 <br />of Assessors Map 17 03 08 31 <br />Zoning: AG Agricultural with /UL Urbanlzable land Overlay <br />NO <br />Location: 3510 Walton Lane, west side of Walton Lane between <br />Oemson Way and Ashbury Drive <br />Representative: Sophie McGinley, Metro Planning, Inc <br />EC 9.7825(2) The proposed annexation is consistentwith applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in <br />Lead City Staff: Rodney Bohner, City of Eugene Planning Division, <br />541£82-543] <br />EVALULATION: <br />Based on the Information provided by the applicant, the City has determined that this request complies <br />with Eugene Code LEG) Semon 9.7805 Annexation Applicability. As such, It is subject to review and <br />approval In accordance with the requirements, appliati0n criteria and procedures of EC 9.7800 through <br />9.7835. The applicable approval a terla are presented below In bold typeface with findings and <br />conduslons following each. <br />EC 9.M25(l) The land proposed to be annexed swithin the crtys urban growth boundary and is: <br />(a) Contiguous to the city limits; or <br />(b) Separated from the city only by a public right of way or a stream, bay, lake or other <br />body ofwater. <br />CompliesFindings: <br />The annexation area lswlthln the Clyss urban growth boundary(UGB), and is <br />cnfamous totheCityllmlts, consistent with subsection (a) <br />IT <br />NO <br />TES <br />EC 9.7825(2) The proposed annexation is consistentwith applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in <br />aapplicable refinement lane. <br />Complies <br />Findings: Several policies from the Metro Plan provide support for this annexation by <br />encouraging compact urban growth toadhleveefficient use of and urban service <br />® <br />E] NO <br />YES <br />provisions within the UGB,Including the following polldes from the Growth <br />Management section (In ltzllctext): <br />Policy B. Land with In the UGB may be convenadfrom urbanlzable to urban only <br />through annexation to a city ween It isfou no that <br />a. A minim um level of Ary urban facilities an dservlcec can be provided to the <br />area in an orderly and efficient manner. <br />b. There will be a logical area and dm e within which to deliver urban servicer <br />andfacilltlar. Conversion of urbanlzable land to urban shall also be <br />consistent with the Metro Plan. (page 11 CA) <br />Po11cy10. Annexation to o city through normal processes shall continue to be the <br />highest priority. (pay ell C 5). <br />LH Fund 3 1ple-al oesmx, 2018 EYE <br />