Ordinance No. 20270 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

s~assed the requirements of, the citizen involvement provisions~ Specifically, onAugust 30``2002, the City provide~ written mailed notice of the October 1, 2002, joint Eugene and ~_ane County Plannifig commission public heating on the Fall 2002 Dr~ft La'c1 Use C~e Amendments. The notice included information on the basis for the draft amendments and applic£t)le approval criteria. The notice was provided to the Lane County and City of Springfield ?lanning Directors and to all neigthborhood groups officially recognized by the city council In add/t/on., the notice was provided to the following orgarfizations involved in local land use regulations: 1) PRC~ES (Professionals ~br Responsible Urban Development in Eugene-Springfield; 2) Eugene Area Chamber of Commerce; 3) Home Builders Association of Lane County; 4) Friends of Eugene; and 5) 1000 Friends of Oregon. Any party that had request notice of the draft code amendments or that provided pubhc testimony was also added to an "interested party" hst and provided written mailed notice of the public heafing~ Legal notice in the local newspaper was also provided in accordance with Lane County code amendment requirements~ On October 1~ 2002, Eugene and Lane County Planning Commissions held a joint public heating on the draft amendments. The Eugene Planning Commission held work sessions on October 7 and October 8 and forwarded reconynnendations to the Eugene City Council On October 17, 2002~ written mailed notice was provided regarding the Eugene City Council public headngofOctober28, 2002. The notice was mailed to all interested parties. The pubhc heating notice and a copy of all three ordinances were provided on the City, website. Oal . To establish a land use ptanning process and policy framework as basis for at) decisions and actions related to use q£1and and t-o assure an a~tequatb factual basis for such decisions and actions. The record shows that there is an adequate factual base for the amendments. To comply with the Goal 2 coordination reqmrement, the City coordinated the adoption of the amendments with all affected governmental ~ts. Specifically, the City pro¼ded written mailed notice of the proposed amendments to the City of sP~Sngfield ~d Lan~ ~ounty. The City of Springfield pr0~,id;d no comments on the pending amendments. ~e County Planning commission held a ioint public hearing Mth the Eugene Planning Commission and will forward recommendations to the Lane Comnty Board of Commissioners for application in the urban transition area. In addition, EWEB and School District 4J were provided ~tten notice due to the nature of some of the proposed amendrnents~ There are no Goal 2 Exceptions required for these amendments~ ~.al 3: Agricultural Land& To Preserve Agricultural Lands. The amendments do not affect any land designated for agricultural use. Therefbre, Goal 3 is not applicable or relevant to the amendments. ~[ 4 ~ FQrest~~d& To conserve forest lands. The amendments do not affect any land designated for forest use. Therefore, Goal 4 is not applicable ExbAbit A - 2