My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20270
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2002 No. 20242-20273
>
Ordinance No. 20270
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:44:14 PM
Creation date
7/26/2005 8:14:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
11/25/2002
Document_Number
20270
CMO_Effective_Date
12/25/2002
Author
James D. Torrey
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a one-family dwelling in C-1 or C-2 if it is above a nonresidential use on the ground floor. <br />Ordinance No. 1 also mends the code to Cla~fy that greater residential lot density- is ailowed when <br />the cluster subdivision process is used. <br /> <br />The ordinance concerning nodal development includes a change to clarify the City's intent that <br />residential development in the nodal deV;lopment areas achiev~ an averag~ density ~f 12 units pe~ <br />net residential acre. It also sets the minimmn density requirement for nodal development areas <br />within the R-1 and R-1.5 zones at 8 units per net residential acre. The amendments in this ordinance <br />related to minimum residential densities for different base zones exceed those set forth in the Land <br />Use Code, consistent with the intent to achieve an average of 12 units per net residential acre. <br /> <br />The ordinance conce~ng secondary dwellings and flag lots amends the code to permit secondary <br />dwellings on flag lots and to provide specific lot dimensions necessary for locating secondary <br />dwellin~s. It revi~es provisions ~'or the R-~ zone to allow home occupations and secondary dwellings <br />on flag 1;ts of 13, 5(J0 square feet or more. It reAuces the setback ~or residential flag a~d alley l(~ts <br />to make them easier t° develop. None of these provisions would render residential lands <br />unbuildable. Ln fact, they increase the potential for residential development in the City. The <br />anendments have no impact on the supply of residential lands and are therefore consistent with Goal <br />10. <br /> <br />Goal J j- Public Facilities ...... and Set-vices To ~_Man and develo~p a timely,, orderly and ~cient <br />arrangement ef public ~/~cilities and Sero, ices W se~e as a framework ~r urban and rural <br />development. ' _ <br /> <br />The ~en~ents do not concern ~e Ci~'s provismn of public facilities and se~ices. Therefore, <br />Goal 1 t does not apply. <br /> <br /> J- ~ran tio~. To provide and encourage a safe, convenientand economic trana~ortation <br />sYStem. <br /> <br />~e men~ents do not s~fic~tly ~fect a ~spo2afion facility. ~erefore, Goal 12 does not <br />apply. <br /> <br />Goal ]~-._.~n nse~atio~. To conserve ener~ <br /> <br />The mendments do not concern ener~ conse~afion. Therefore, Goal 13 does not apply. <br /> <br />~114~- Ur._baniz~tion. To provide for an Orderly, and e~ficient transition~om ~rat to urban land <br /> <br /> he amendments do not affect the C~ty s provisions regar&ng the transition of land from rural to <br />urbart <br /> uses. Therefore, Goal 14 does ~ot ~pply. <br /> <br />Exhibit A - 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.