Laserfiche WebLink
Services such as those provided by Eugene’s Planning and Development Department’s Building and Permit <br />Services Division, which provides the review/approval/inspection of development permits, are directed to be 100% <br />fee supported. Reduction in fees as a green/LID incentive would require subsidy to ensure that the resources <br />needed to meet development review and permitting demands are adequate and to maintain equity in permit fees. <br />Similarly, stormwater System Development Charge and user fee rates are developed from comprehensive <br />analyses of actual funding needs to provide infrastructure system capacity for new development as well as for the <br />on-going operation and maintenance of the system. A reduction in revenue above and beyond what is already in <br />place for the recognition of actual reduced system demand would also require subsidy to ensure the city’s ability <br />to fund capital projects for which the fees are collected and to adequately operate and maintain the stormwater <br />system. <br />Increased public awareness of the benefits of LID affecting the marketability of developments using LID practices, <br />along with demonstration of potentially lower development construction costs through use of LID elements may <br />provide the strongest and most viable financial incentives. <br />Expedited Permitting <br />Extending and enhancing expedited permitting services may provide a modest LID incentive. The timing and <br />desired schedule for development projects often has a high value and reduced/expedited review time for <br />development meeting certain LID objectives would likely be an effective way to encourage use of LID practices. <br />Some communities around the country that provide expedited permitting processes include Issaquah, WA, Santa <br />Monica, CA, and several communities in Florida. Eugene now offers special project assistance for proposed <br />LEED-certified projects, which includes streamlined permit review times, designated staff teams, consultations <br />with staff, and priority in inspections. This incentive program could be expanded to apply to non-LEED projects <br />that incorporate certain LID strategies. This would require development of criteria for minimum qualification of <br />“LID-certified” development projects. <br />Barriers to expedited permitting include magnitude of value in relationship other factors influencing development <br />choices, limitations on staff resources to dedicate to such a program, impacts on other customer’s permits and <br />related equity concerns, and required timing of opportunity for public comment (e.g. land use applications). <br />Recognition <br />Being recognized as a “green” developer or business is a desirable attribute in today’s world of environmental <br />awareness and sustainability efforts and achievements. A highly visible local Green Building and LID recognition <br />program could go hand-in-hand with other types of incentives. This would require development of criteria for <br />minimum qualification of “LID-certified” development projects. <br />Barriers to recognition incentives are perceptions of the value of recognition and limitations in the degree of actual <br />influence that such incentives may have. <br />Section 4: Conclusion & Recommendations <br />Council directed inclusion of a comprehensive review of LID in the FY08 Planning Division and Stormwater <br />Management Team work plans to identify barriers and approaches to increase the use of LID practices for <br />stormwater management, consistent with densification policies and code provisions. Because LID includes <br />principles of an integrated site design, it can have broad implications and complex inter-relations to other <br />community standards and objectives around land use, growth management and development standards. Given <br />the breadth of LID, a cross-functional, inter-disciplinary team was employed to address the scope of work for the <br />review. The inter-disciplinary staff team completed the review in a manner which endeavored to respond to <br />council direction, within the general timeframe directed and utilizing existing staff resources. <br />Positive outcomes of the review included a thorough and open approach to the review, building of working <br />relationships within the cross-functional team, a strong realization that the City has a broad spectrum of existing <br />regulations and programs in place which contribute to the implementation of LID practices, surfacing of potential <br />September, 2008 City of Eugene LID Report, Page 20 of <br />26 <br />