Laserfiche WebLink
a retrofit practice to reduce runoff volumes, pollutant loadings, and the overall impacts of existing <br />development on the affected receiving waters. <br />Typical LID practices or facilities were found to include use of swales, rain gardens, infiltration trenches, green <br />roofs, pervious pavements, reduction of paving widths (skinny streets), impervious surface reductions, and open <br />space preservation. <br />C. Framework and Methodology for Review <br />The team developed a framework for a systematic review of all relevant City regulations, policies and procedures <br />related to green infrastructure and LID. This framework was modeled in part from methods used by other <br />jurisdictions in completing LID review and evaluation of their LID implementation, and consisted of the following <br />key steps: <br />a. Scan existing regulations, policies, standards and programs to identify those potentially relevant to LID <br />b. Evaluate and rank potentially relevant areas for degree of relevance to LID elements and contribution to <br />meeting LID objectives <br />c. Identify areas with moderate to high potential for increasing implementation of LID practices <br />d. Identify barriers to increasing implementation of LID practices <br />e. Identify incentives to increasing implementation of LID practices <br />An initial scan of code, regulations, policies, procedures, standards, plans, program areas and incentives was <br />performed to identify potentially relevant areas and specific provisions. This initial scan resulted in a <br />comprehensive list which, over several months, was reviewed in detail and discussed by the team; items were <br />added and removed from the list by consensus of the team. This list of regulations and practices potentially <br />relevant to LID was ultimately refined and condensed into the working summary document located in Appendix A. <br />Potentially relevant regulations and programs were then evaluated for degree of LID relevance based on their <br />potential for meeting the council-directed objective to “increase the use of low-impact development practices for <br />stormwater management.” A ranking system was developed and applied by team members to each area of <br />regulation or program element based on its contribution to the key elements of LID (infiltration, filtering, storage, <br />evaporation, reduction, and detention of stormwater runoff); the team average ranking was determined for each <br />area. The final inventory of relevant regulations and programs consisted of those items on the comprehensive list <br />which ranked with moderate to high overall relevancy, per average of individual team member responses, to <br />meeting LID objectives. <br />These relevant areas were then evaluated for potential modification to increase the use of low impact <br />development practices for stormwater management in Eugene. The basic question asked by the review team <br />was “could we do more”. This evaluative process considered the degree to which existing regulations, programs <br />and practices were already focused and optimized for meeting LID objectives, the frequency of application of the <br />regulation or program to LID objectives, the magnitude of impact on LID, comparison to best practices in other <br />communities, and the scope of resources required for change versus degree of gain in LID practices. Based on <br />these considerations, areas were determined to have Low, Medium, or High potential for increasing Eugene’s use <br />of LID practices. Potential barriers to changes in each area were then identified and documented. The results of <br />this evaluation are summarized in Table A and presented in more detail in Appendix A of this report. <br />In addition, incentive-based approaches as utilized in other communities were researched and evaluated for <br />potential for increasing use of LID. <br />The intended outcomes of review included determination of regulations and programs currently in place with a <br />significant contribution to LID and identification of areas where the city could do more to increase use of LID. The <br />following sections summarize the result of the review. <br />September, 2008 City of Eugene LID Report, Page 3 of <br />26 <br />