Laserfiche WebLink
Commercial Mixed-Use development. (Policy 5) <br />The proposed north-south drainage channel on the south side of <br />Royal Avenue that bisects property owed by Ron Bounds (Map and <br />Tax Lot number 17-04-20-00-01300) shall be designed so as to <br />avoid the removal of the residential structure on that parcel. The <br />land on which the residential structure is sited, other than land <br />required for the construction of the drainage channel and corridor, <br />shall retain its current zoning (AG/UL) and use allowances until the <br />property is annexed to the City of Eugene and rezoned consistent <br />with the Royal Avenue Specific Plan. Annexation and rezoning <br />shall be initiated completely at the discretion of the property owner. <br />(Policy 6) <br />With the exception of the future extension of Roosevelt Boulevard <br />and the reconstruction of Royal Avenue, the City shall not require <br />the construction of any street or alley depicted on the Royal Avenue <br />Land Use diagram until the property on which that street or alley is <br />shown is annexed to the City and approved t~r new development. <br />New development is defined, for the purpose of this policy~ the same <br />as that of Policy #2. (Policy 9) <br /> <br />Section 6. The January 2002 Royal Avenue Specific Plan (as amended by Errata dated June <br /> <br />2002, and not including Appendices B or C), and the Legislative Findings attached as Exhibit <br /> <br />serve as findings in support of this Ordinance, but are not adopted. <br /> <br />Section 7. The maps referenced in this Ordinance specific to the Royal Node are attached <br /> <br />hereto, to be numerically incorporated in Chapter 9 of the Eugene Code, 1971. <br /> <br />Section 8~ The City Recorder, at the request of, or with the concurrence of the City Attorney, <br /> <br />is authorized to administratively correct any reference errors contained herein or in other provisions <br /> <br />of the Eugene Code, 1971, to the provisions added, amended or repealed herein. <br /> <br />Section 9. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance <br /> <br />is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion <br /> <br />shall be deemed a separate, distinct and ~ndependent provision and such holding shall not affect the <br /> <br />validity of the remaining portions hereof. <br /> <br />Ordinance - 24 <br /> <br /> <br />