Laserfiche WebLink
ExhibR C <br /> <br /> Findings of Consistency of Danebo Nodal Development Amendments <br /> ~ith Metr° Vial Amendment and Zone Cl~ange Criteria <br /> <br /> Amendment ~riteria:, <br /> <br />~e Eugene C~ty Council Mil apply the folloMng criteria from Eugene Code Section 9~7730(3) <br />to the proposed Me~o Plan men~ent to apply ~e ND Nodal Development designation: <br /> <br /> (a) The amendment must be consistent wi~ ~e relev~t statewide planning <br /> goals adopted by the L~d Conservation and Development Co~issio~; <br /> <br /> (b) Adoption of the amendmeTM must not m~e the Me~o Plan internally <br /> ~nconsistenL <br /> <br />(a) The amendment must be consistent w~th the relevant statewide planning goals <br /> adopted by <br /> the ~and Conse~afion and Development Commission. <br /> <br /> Goal 1 ~ C~t~en Involvement: To develo~ a citizen invoh, ement pro.am that insures <br /> the opportuniCy~for citizens to be involved in all phases of the ~Ianning process. <br /> <br />The C~W has ac~Owledged provisions for citizen ~vOlvement which ~ns~e the oppo~u~ for <br />ck~zens to be involved in all phases of the Plying process and set om requirements for such <br />~nv°lvement. The action t~en did not amend the citizen ~nvolvement progrm. The process for <br />adopting tNs ord~n~ce complied Mth Goal 1 s~nce it complied Mth, and sucassed the <br />req~re~ems o~; ~e qfizen ~volvemem provisions. <br /> <br />The Metro PI~ men.cut application is subject to ~e public notification and he~ng processes <br />~opted by ~e C~W of Eugene }n 9.7735, as ~odified by the Eugene C~W CoUnCil for ~his <br />Co~ncil4~fiated ~mendm;m under EC 9.7750(1), ~d ~n EC 9.5520. <br /> <br />of a public hearing <br /> <br />on <br /> <br /> . No <br />public <br /> and m <br /> <br />Register-Guar& On <br /> sed <br /> 6, 2003, completed <br /> <br />Exhibit C ~ 1 <br /> <br /> <br />