Laserfiche WebLink
Council Discussion <br />• Councilor Clark- asked about the difference in costs between recruiting a new Presiding <br />Judge and the direct appointment of Judge Gill; supported Judge Gill and noted the savings <br />of time and money using a direct appoint approach. <br />• Councilor Syrett - supported interviewing Judge Gill with the goal of direct appoint; Judge <br />Gill has the experience, initiative, and local reputation to be immediately successful; <br />supported transition the position to City Council employee status with more frequent <br />updates to the council. <br />• Councilor Pryor - said he trusted Judge Allen's recommendation to promote Judge Gill; <br />impressed with his ideas, commitment and understanding of local system; supported <br />moving to a council employee model and more robust role in recognition of how the city has <br />grown and changed. <br />• Councilor Zelenka - supported the council employee model; leaning toward an open <br />recruitment as a matter of good public policy; asked about the estimated size of the <br />applicant pool. <br />• Councilor Semple - expressed support for Judge Gill who loves the work and has great <br />experience; supported direct -appoint process. <br />• Councilor Taylor - clarified that Judge Allen was automatically reappointed every time his <br />contract was renewed; council may discontinue the judge's employment at any time; <br />supported interviewing Judge Gill prior to appointment. <br />• Councilor Evans - noted that Municipal Court had significant issue before the arrival of <br />Judge Allen; supported the direct -appoint of Judge Gill and transitioning to the council <br />employee model. <br />• Mayor Vinis - clarified that the two decisions before council were whether they want to <br />pursue a code amendment that would change the status of Presiding Judge to a council <br />employee position and whether they wished to directly appoint Judge Gill. <br />MOTION: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Syrett, moved to direct the City <br />Manager to 1) bring back the proposed code language in the AIS, Attachment A to a <br />public hearing to make the City Judge a council employee and 2) to schedule as soon <br />as practicable an interview with Judge Gill to consider the possibility of direct <br />appointment of him. <br />• Councilor Zelenka - asked about the sequencing of the two directions given by council <br />• Councilor Syrett - said an interview of Judge Gill is important and supported scheduling it <br />during a regular council work session; councilors can solicit questions from their <br />constituents; expressed support for direct appoint option in recognition of Judge Gill's <br />demonstrated experience and commitment to community. <br />• Councilor Clark - agreed with Councilor Syrett and noted that the council has the ability to <br />go a different direction after the interview, if the results of the interview warrant that. <br />• Councilor Taylor - supported a process that gives others an opportunity to apply for the <br />position. <br />VOTE: PASSED 7:1, Councilor Taylor opposed. <br />3. WORK SESSION: Parking Update <br />Parking and Technology Manager Jeff Petry outlined planned changes to the parking program <br />fee schedule, and provided information about the input received to the proposed rate increase. <br />MINUTES — Eugene City Council January 28, 2019 Page 2 <br />Work Session <br />