Laserfiche WebLink
9. David Monk - supported efforts to find new revenue to address housing crisis; opposed ordinance. <br />10. Phyllis Hockley - said Churchwomen United supports the CET to fund affordable housing. <br />11. Seda Collier - said the CET presents an opportunity to give the City's Green Building Program teeth. <br />12. Michael Gannon - urged council to look more aggressively at strategies for needed housing. <br />13. Celine Harris - said the Democratic Party of Lane County supports a one percent CET. <br />14. Kim Arscott - supported a CET that makes the construction of missing middle housing affordable. <br />15. John VanLandingham - encouraged adoption of the CET rate supported by Better Housing Together. <br />16. Kevin Cronin - spoke as a renter and tenant advocate; supported phased -in CET. <br />17. Anna Pena - supported a one percent CET to benefit construction of affordable housing. <br />18. Emily Mooney - supported a one percent CET to benefit construction of affordable housing. <br />19. Chris Wig - supported immediate passage of a one percent CET to benefit affordable housing. <br />20. Matthew Katz - supported adoption of a CET to benefit construction of affordable housing. <br />21. Stephen Carson - asked why the CET would be offset by systems development charge funds. <br />22. Kevin Orr - supported the CET ordinance; will make affordable student housing accessible. <br />23. Carmel Perez Snyder - said AARP supports the proposal for a phased CET. <br />24. Josephine Ruff- supported a one percent CET to benefit construction of affordable housing. <br />25. Hannah Argento-McCurdy - supported a one percent CET for construction of affordable housing. <br />26. Sutter Munizich - supported a one percent CET to benefit construction of affordable housing. <br />27. Tristan Waits - supported a CET to benefit construction of affordable housing. <br />28. Joshua Caraco - supported a CET as a means to benefit construction of affordable housing. <br />29. Mary Brorby - urged creativity, giving developers of low-income housing a tax break. <br />30. Jan Fillinger - supported a CET, but with related changes to the code around lot size, ADUs, etc. <br />31. Erin Barnhart - supported a CET to benefit construction of affordable housing; social justice issue. <br />32. Mysti Frost- supported a one percent CET to benefit construction of affordable housing. <br />33. Steve Coatsworth - spoke about his experience with no -cause evictions; supported CET. <br />34. John Thielking - opposed current CET proposal, noting effect of 3-D printing technology on housing. <br />Mayor Vinis closed the public hearing. <br />Council Discussion <br />• Councilor Taylor - agreed with those who expressed opposition to a CET on the grounds that it does <br />not generate new revenue. <br />• Councilor Zelenka - noted that the proposed General Fund offset would be temporary; other Oregon <br />communities adopted CETs with a one percent rate; council is committed to taking other steps to <br />address the lack of affordable housing. <br />• Councilor Clark - encouraged everyone to respect the opinions of others; appreciated work done to <br />develop CET proposal; said that larger -scale developers should be included in the conversation about <br />the impacts of a C ET. <br />• Mayor Vinis - said there has been a significant amount of public input and public outreach throughout <br />the process of developing the CET proposal; announced that the ordinance was scheduled for action in <br />early April. <br />4. PUBLIC HEARING: An Ordinance Concerning Unlawful Transfer on Vehicular Portion of <br />Right -of -Way, Adding Section 5.170 to the Eugene Code, 1971, and Amending Section <br />5.990 of that Code <br />City Manager Jon Ruiz introduced the public hearing topic. <br />Mayor Vinis opened the public hearing. <br />MINUTES — Eugene City Public Hearing February 19, 2019 Page 2 <br />