My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.23.2019 City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2019
>
02-23-19
>
2.23.2019 City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2019 4:38:25 PM
Creation date
4/9/2019 4:38:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Minutes
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Meeting
City_Council_Meeting_Date
2/23/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Councilor Clark- asked what level of analysis was done on the possible negative repercussions <br />of a payroll tax; expressed concern that implementing the proposed tax could damage Eugene's <br />relationship with Springfield since it will affect non-residents who work in Eugene. <br />• Mayor Vinis - asked about the preliminary reaction of non -profits to the proposed tax. <br />• Councilor Zelenka - said it was counterproductive to reduce the discussion to only one <br />recommended option; supported further consideration of its effect on workers who don't live in <br />the city, ways to make the tax more progressive, possible exemptions of reductions for non- <br />profits and low-income workers, and tying the tax to economic prosperity. <br />• Councilor Semple - asked for information about the impact on the revenue generated if non- <br />profits are exempted; said that everyone should contribute at some level to the costs of <br />improved public safety. <br />• Councilor Syrett - spoke to the regressive vs progressive issue, noting that a flat fee is <br />regressive; said public safety improvements will benefit everyone, including Springfield <br />residents. <br />• Mayor Vinis - cautioned that many of the area's largest employers are non -profits; said Eugene <br />is the hub of the region and carries a larger burden in terms of social service and public safety <br />needs; said the process for arriving at the committee recommendation was faithful to council <br />direction. <br />• Councilor Clark- noted that residents of unincorporated River Road/Santa Clara don't <br />currently support public safety through taxes; encouraged further consideration of annexation <br />as a potential revenue source; supported an increase to the transient room tax. <br />• Councilor Semple - agreed that there is a direct benefit to Springfield residents of improved <br />public safety services, particularly Eugene Springfield Fire service; supported an increase in the <br />room tax. <br />• Councilor Pryor - said the process included conversations with representatives from other <br />communities; expressed concern about the ease of the mechanism for reporting and collecting; <br />noted that if more people are brought into the population through annexation, the need for <br />service will increase. <br />• Councilor Syrett - suggested that more analysis would be needed if the council is interested in <br />pursuing annexations as means to generate public safety revenue. <br />• Councilor Taylor - said that annexation of River Road/Santa Clara properties wouldn't require <br />infrastructure tax dollars, noting that money is currently being spent on public safety in that area. <br />• Mayor Vinis - reminded council that their goal for any new revenue source is to provide a <br />seamless transition from the bridge funding. <br />Revenue Requirement <br />• Councilor Clark - suggested consideration of a revenue source that starts small and increases as <br />need grows. <br />• Councilor Zelenka - asked for more information about the components of the five percent <br />inflation rate. <br />Payroll Tax Assumptions <br />• Councilor Zelenka - asked for information about the data on the percentage of agencies and the <br />non-compliance collection rate. <br />• Councilor Clark - noted that many who live in Eugene are part of the gig economy, consultants, <br />or self-employed; asked what their impact would be on the tax assumptions. <br />Same Rate <br />• Councilor Taylor - asked if consideration was given to exempting those who make under a <br />certain amount. <br />• Councilor Syrett - asked questions about the presentation of the data. <br />MINUTES - Eugene City Council February 23, 2019 Page 3 <br />Workshop <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.