Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit C <br /> <br /> Findings of Consistency <br />With Criteria for Approval of Metro Plan Amendment <br /> <br />The critetia for approval of a Metro Plan amendment are found in Chapter 9 of the Eugene Code <br />at 9.7730(3): <br /> <br />Cfitetia for Approval of Plan Amendment. The following critetia shall be applied by the city <br />council in approving or denyqng a Metro Plan amendment application: <br /> <br />(a) <br /> <br />(h) <br /> <br />The amendment must be consistent with the relevant Statewide Planning Goals adopted <br />by the Land Conservation and Development Commission; and <br />Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. <br /> <br />(a) The amendment must be consistent with the relevant Statewide Planning Goals. <br /> <br />Goal i - Citizen Involvement. To develop a citizen involvement program that ensures the <br />opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process. <br /> <br />The City has acknowledged provisions for citizen involvement that ensure the opportunity for <br />citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process and set out requirements fbr such <br />involvement. The adoption of these ordinances does not amend the ckizen involvement <br />progrm, The process for adopting them complied with Goal 1 since it complied with, and <br />surpassed the requirements of, the citizen involvement provisions. <br /> <br />The process for adopting a Goal 5 Invemory for the area within the Eugene Urban Growth <br />Boundary has provided numerous opportunities for citizen involvement. A public involvement <br />plan for the Goal 5 process was reviewed ~d approved by the Joint Planning Commission <br />Commktee in May, 2000. In Jtme 2000, two pubhc workshops were held to provide an overview <br />of the Goal 5 process for Springfield, Eugene and Lane County within the Metro Plan boundary. <br />J~ April 2001, a public workshop has held to review the &aft inventory and significance criteria <br />for Springfield, Eugene and Lane County within the Metro Plan boundary. On December 17, <br />2002, a pubhc heating was held before the Eugene Planning Commission on the Goal 5 <br />inventory ofripmian and upland wildlife habitat sites within the urban growth boundary. All <br />owners of affected and adjacent properties were notified, in addition to a large list of interested <br />parties. The Eugene Planning Commission opened the public record for additional written <br />comments kom February 3, 2003 to February 7, 2003 and from March 17, 2003 to March 28, <br />2003. The Eugene Planning and Development Department staffheld a public infbrmation <br />meeting on May 21, 2003 on the status of the Goal 5 inventory. On June 9, 2003 a public <br />hearing was held before the Eugene City Council. In addition to public meetings and mailed <br />notices, ptinted materials related to these proceedings were made available at Planning and <br />Development Department offices and via the City's Intemet site prior to each meeting. <br /> <br />As described above, the opportunities that have been provided for citizen involvement are more <br /> <br /> <br />