AMENDED Agenda Packet 4-24-19 Work Session

Home Browse Search

299 Can we expect this will all be ecologically sound, sustainable with materials, construction etc.? Also, where is the interface with the natural environment other than river viewing? 2/1/2019 2:33 PM 300 The waterfront should remain in the public domain -- private/semi-private uses should not get the prime views/access. 2/1/2019 2:03 PM 301 Local businesses only please.2/1/2019 9:53 AM 302 Do it!2/1/2019 9:39 AM 303 Surveys are fine, but great things are never designed by committee. Do not let the public design the building for you. 2/1/2019 9:15 AM 304 parking parking.2/1/2019 9:10 AM 305 Safety. Cannot allowed people to camp out on the streets as they do downtown.2/1/2019 9:07 AM 306 Healthy connections to the surrounding area, including the bike paths will allow pedestrian traffic to flow freely. Please, please, prioritize pedestrian & bicycle traffic. 2/1/2019 8:59 AM 307 It might be good to plan for public use or rental of meeting spaces and/or event spaces (like the community centers) 1/31/2019 10:38 PM 308 parking Easy access, free parking. Downtown is getting crowded. Expensive and not so great to go visit. 1/31/2019 10:12 PM 309 Thank you for preserving this building and being transparent and including public in the process.1/31/2019 5:52 PM 310 There needs to be spaces for all socio-economic groups in our community. I like the overlook idea but it shouldn’t only be accessible to people who can pay for a beverage or meal. That opportunity should be available to all. Additionally some soace needs to be provided for community groups to meet. There are far too few places this is possible in the city. Do not just office space but also space for community groups to work it gather. 1/31/2019 5:49 PM 311 Great job, so far.1/31/2019 5:33 PM 312 NA 1/31/2019 5:29 PM 313 Great work! Looking forward to more consumer space 1/31/2019 5:06 PM 314 Don’t add the big office building. If it’s not “financial” without it, fix that problem rather than wrecking the building. 1/31/2019 4:34 PM 315 Like the additional volume that complements the old Steam Plant building contrasts in a positive way with the existing Steamplant building. I would keep the interior of the old Steam Plant building as open and raw as possible and only add necessary functions as contrasting ultra modern volumes the are standing free in the existing space. 1/31/2019 4:11 PM 316 I would not want the Steam Plant to become too shiny or massive (commercial extensions) and out of scale with the natural setting. The Overlook too should not overshadow the pedestrian/bike path along the river. Interior walls should not be used as advertising space for Nike, T&F, or the UO. The Steam Plant should be a public space, a respite from City noise, a place for all of us to enjoy. 1/31/2019 3:42 PM 317 GO BIG - Do not cut corners. The Steam Plant will be successful.1/31/2019 3:01 PM 318 Detour the homeless. Safety is the number one concern.1/31/2019 2:10 PM 319 Keep it user friendly and approachable.1/31/2019 12:41 PM 320 parking Adequate bicycle parking should be available. Surrounding plantings and sitting spaces should be native river species. 1/31/2019 12:33 PM 321 It would also be a great place for upscale condo's. require owner living, not rented. perhaps on the top floor. Beautiful view. 1/31/2019 12:10 PM 322 We support you!1/31/2019 11:45 AM 323 Keep the added structure compatible and relevant to the existing historic structure in design and quality of materials. 1/31/2019 9:51 AM 324 For ten plus years, I've part of a small group of people who have felt that the steam plant had a huge potential to bring people to the river to be entertained, learn and to mingle and your vision fills my Eugene heart ansoul with that potential . Thank You! Martha Snyder 1/31/2019 3:04 AM 78 / 128 Comments Sought on Proposed Steam Plant Concept April 24, 2019, Work Session - Item 1