Laserfiche WebLink
INTRODUCTION <br />1. BACKGROUND <br />In March of 2018, Lane County, in collaboration with the City <br />of Eugene, secured the services of the Technical Assistance <br />Collaborative Inc., (TAC) to conduct a public shelter feasibility <br />study. As part of the study, TAC was to assess the current homeless <br />crisis response and service system within Lane County, including <br />resource capacity and gaps within various system components <br />such as coordinated entry (CE), diversion, outreach, day shelters, <br />emergency shelters (ES), transitional housing (TH), rapid-rehousing <br />(RRH), and permanent supportive housing (PSH). Since that time, <br />TAC has conducted a comprehensive review and analysis of Lane <br />County’s homeless service and crisis response system, culminating <br />in this report. The report outlines a number of recommendations <br />related to Lane County’s homeless system overall, as well as <br />specific recommendations for the creation of a public emergency <br />shelter. <br />2. METHODOLOGY <br />TAC’s methodology to complete a shelter feasibility study focused <br />on conducting a comprehensive assessment and analysis of all <br />major system components within Lane County’s homeless system. <br />While emergency shelters play a crucial role in addressing a <br />person’s immediate housing crisis needs, it is important to note <br />that shelter alone cannot be a community’s singular strategy to <br />end homelessness. For this reason, TAC approached this study <br />with a system-wide lens and ensured our analysis incorporated <br />data and information from multiple sources within different <br />system components. <br />Below is a detailed description of our methodology and steps <br />leading to the findings and strategic recommendations in this <br />report. Over the course of seven months, TAC completed the <br />following: <br />Data and Information Collection <br />TAC collected and reviewed data from the following sources: <br />• Lane County’s Homelessness Management Information <br />System (HMIS) including Annual Performance Reports for <br />ES, TH, RRH, and PSH, and custom reports provided by Lane <br />County <br />• Coordinated entry system reports <br />• Homeless Point-in-Time counts from 2011 to 2018 <br />• Housing Inventory Chart (HIC) from 2018 <br />• Federal fiscal year 2016 and 2017 system performance <br />measures (SPM) reports <br />• Lane County CE written standards <br />• Poverty and Homelessness Board (PHB) Strategic Plan 2016- <br />2021 <br />• PHB governance charter <br />Stakeholder Interviews & Meetings <br />TAC gathered information from a wide range of Lane County <br />stakeholders. Over the course of six months, TAC staff conducted <br />over 30 stakeholder interviews, participated in a Poverty and <br />Homelessness Board Meeting, facilitated two focus groups, <br />and presented at the joint public meeting of the Eugene City <br />Council and Lane County Commissioners. Stakeholder interviews <br />and meetings occurred both on-site and off-site, and included <br />representation from the following groups: <br />• Staff from Lane County and the City of Eugene <br />• Emergency shelter providers, housing providers, housing <br />developers, advocates, consumers, funders, and other <br />community stakeholders <br />• Eugene City Council Members and Lane County <br />Commissioners <br />• A list of the specific agencies interviewed is provided in <br />Appendix A. <br />Analysis & Assessment of Information <br />Throughout the course of the data collection and stakeholder <br />interviews, TAC continuously assessed the information obtained <br />to understand each system component, how these components <br />are accessed by clients, and how the components relate to <br />or interact with each other. This analysis included evaluating <br />demographic information of those experiencing homelessness, <br />highlighting salient data points, identifying system gaps, evaluating <br />performance issues, and identifying overarching themes. The data <br />and information analysis provided the basis for the development of <br />the system map, key recommendations, and the system modeling. <br />Development of the System Map <br />TAC drafted an accessible, easy-to-understand map of the Lane <br />County homeless service system. The map illustrates the primary <br />aspects of the homeless service system including emergency <br />shelter, alternate shelter options, day access centers, outreach, <br />coordinated entry, and the housing options available. The map <br />highlights the myriad of “paths” an individual or family experiencing <br />a housing crisis could take to address their crisis such as accessing <br />PSH, RRH, TH, or other affordable housing and private market <br />housing. The goal of the map is to present the system flow and <br />illustrate where specific gaps within the system exist, as well as <br />identify where households get “stuck” without adequate resources <br />to address their homelessness crisis. The map of Lane County <br />Homeless Service System is included in Appendix B. <br />Development of System Modeling <br />TAC created a scenario planning tool to model the impact of <br />modifications to various aspects of the county’s crisis response <br />system. The system modeling took into account factors such as <br />the number of people experiencing homelessness, the amount <br />of resources available within each system component, and the <br />utilization and turnover rate for each of the system components. <br />TAC used the system modeling to refine and “right-size” our <br />recommendations. The system modeling analysis is included in <br />Appendix C. <br />PAGE 2 <br />May 13, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item 1