Laserfiche WebLink
While increasing emergency shelter beds will help respond to the <br />immediate crisis of unsheltered single adults in the community, <br />without expansion of other system components as well as policy <br />alignment, training, and implementation of best practices across <br />the CoC, the county will be unable to make a significant impact <br />on single adult homelessness. Below, TAC provides a number <br />of system-wide strategic recommendations in addition to the <br />recommendation of increasing low-barrier shelter beds. <br />TAC created a modeling tool in order to determine the “size” of <br />the various recommendations, including the additional number of <br />units or increased staffing. Information about this modeling tool is <br />available in Appendix C. <br />1.SYSTEM-WIDE RECOMMENDATIONS <br />A. Expand and Better Coordinate Outreach <br />Outreach services – proactively engaging people who are on the <br />streets or living in places not meant for human habitation (cars, <br />tents, abandoned buildings, etc.) and connecting them to services <br />– are a key part of ending homelessness in any community. This <br />is especially true in Lane County, given the diverse geography <br />of the CoC and the high number and significant vulnerabilities <br />of unsheltered homeless adults throughout the county. As <br />described above, Lane County does have some outreach activities, <br />but they tend to be for specific populations or are not clearly <br />defined in terms of geographic coverage and linkages to services. <br />TAC’s outreach recommendations rely on the principle that <br />outreach should be fully coordinated and have linkages back to <br />emergency shelter and permanent housing opportunities. Lane <br />County’s outreach priorities should focus on those individuals <br />who have been homeless the longest and present with the most <br />significant barriers so as to connect those individuals to the limited <br />permanent housing assistance (both RRH and PSH) available <br />through Coordinated Entry. The county should also ensure that <br />outreach workers are trained in administering the CoC’s common <br />assessment tool and such assessments are done in accordance <br />with the Coordinated Entry protocol (as discussed below). <br />Further, outreach within the county should be mapped to ensure <br />no gaps in coverage. TAC recommends an actual mapping process <br />where all outreach and coordinated entry personnel work together <br />to identify on paper (a map) where outreach coverages exist and <br />where gaps remain. A focused effort should be made to convene <br />all outreach partners on a periodic basis to engage in coverage <br />discussions as well as case conferencing to strategize around <br />difficult to engage households who may need to be prioritized <br />for service linkages. Outreach workers targeting specific and/or <br />general populations should have a clear communication protocol <br />back to the coordinated entry system and amongst shelter and <br />other outreach teams so that all parts of the crisis response system <br />are working in concert, without gaps or duplication in efforts. <br />As part of this recommendation, TAC recommends, among other <br />direct outreach personnel, one full-time equivalent (FTE) county <br />Outreach Coordinator/Manager who would be responsible for <br />coordinating outreach efforts and implementing streamlined <br />communication and service linkage protocols. This position <br />would help outreach teams for both general and specific <br />populations cross-coordinate efforts, as well as support data <br />collection processes and linkages to the Common Assessment and <br />Coordinated Entry process. This position would also coordinate <br />with the coordinated entry staff for case conferencing and other <br />strategy meetings. The 1 FTE takes into account that this individual <br />may also play the role of a direct outreach worker and supervisor <br />of all outreach workers and activities. The role of Outreach <br />Coordinator/Manager should be responsible for ensuring that <br />outreach and coordinated entry communication and referral <br />protocol are consistent with the larger system of care. <br />Specific Outreach Recommendations <br />1. TAC recommends expanding street outreach to include a <br />minimum of five FTE outreach workers and one FTE County <br />Outreach Coordinator/Manager. <br />2. TAC recommends expanding/redesigning street outreach to <br />become a coordinated system-wide approach, connected to <br />coordinated entry, emergency shelters, and other housing <br />opportunities. <br />3. TAC recommends ongoing and increased use of mobile <br />technology (tablets) with HMIS embedded. This would allow <br />for entries into an “Outreach” project in HMIS before a <br />common assessment is complete, so that there is real-time <br />accounting of all individuals or families living in unsheltered <br />situations. <br />4. TAC recommends a small annual ‘barrier buster’/flexible <br />fund of $50,000 in financial assistance for those engaged by <br />outreach. This assistance should be used only when funds can <br />assist a household in reconnecting to permanent housing. For <br />instance, a small car repair to allow an individual to access <br />employment opportunities, or reconnecting a family’s cell <br />phone service so they can coordinate housing and education <br />needs. This fund would operate similarly to the diversion fund <br />noted below, and may in fact cover many of the same types <br />of costs, particularly when a household has an opportunity to <br />reconnect with family or friends on a temporary or permanent <br />basis. Emergency supplies and crisis goods may be paid for <br />using this fund if and when no other community resources are <br />available to meet that need. <br />STRATEGIC POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS PAGE 12 <br />May 13, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item 1