My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 09/18/02 JEO
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2002
>
CC Minutes - 09/18/02 JEO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:31:27 AM
Creation date
8/1/2005 12:08:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Joint Elected Officials
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
implementation process. She noted there are incentives and they are <br /> redirecting public infrastructure investment into the area because it is a node <br /> and they are going to see a public benefit. She wanted to reconcile this plan <br /> with TransPlan. She wanted to know the assumptions and how this plan <br /> compares with them. <br /> <br /> Nathanson had three questions for the work session. With regard to two <br /> stories, please describe the value of a tall facde that is for appearance only <br /> versus the value of height for functional purpose. Tell them whether there is <br /> some other way to handle multiple entrances and pedestrian access from the <br /> street, if there was another alternative and describe as best they can market <br /> reality. She stated this neighborhood was different than a generic <br /> neighborhood anywhere else in Eugene. She asked to what extent this <br /> factors into any of the testimony they are getting. She asked if the market <br /> analysis was generic or adjusted for this neighborhood. <br /> <br /> Meisner noted the node they were discussing regarding amendments is <br /> small in area but is surrounded by high-density developments. He wanted to <br /> make sure the commercial development is available to those people. He <br /> said he understands wanting contiguous commercial development and at the <br /> same time wanting second story development. He asked (in planning) if they <br /> looked at the relationship of second story retail or other space to the <br /> acreage that is provided for commercial zoning. He asked if so much land <br /> was designated for commercial that would preclude second story <br /> development. He wanted the response in the work session. <br /> <br /> Childs noted since this was a quasi-judicial hearing, the property owner's <br /> representatives have requested that in the event the city council <br /> recommends substantial changes to the ordinance that they reopen the <br /> record to allow them to comment on those changes before final adoption of <br /> the ordinance. She announced they had received that request. <br /> <br /> Mayor Torrey closed the public hearing for the Eugene City Council and they <br /> will take the issue up on October 28, 2002 in a work session with possible <br /> decision making at that time. He added it would take place at 5:30 p.m. in <br /> the McNutt Room. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Dwyer closed the public hearing for the Board of <br /> Commissioners. <br /> <br /> MOTION: to approve a Second Reading and setting a Third Reading and <br /> Deliberation on Wednesday, December 4, 2002 for Ordinance 1180. <br /> <br /> Morrison MOVED, Green SECONDED. <br /> <br />Page 8 - Joint BCC/City of Eugene Public Hearing; 7:00 p.m., September 18, 2002 <br />WD bc/m/02124/T <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.