My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 01/14/02 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2002
>
CC Minutes - 01/14/02 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:26:31 AM
Creation date
8/1/2005 12:08:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilor Bettman concurred with Councilor Nathanson regarding the section in question. She <br />suggested that adoption of the section could potentially mean more police overtime if police were <br />required to respond to protests or demonstrations, and that could be a good reason to let the <br />violation be addressed at the State level. <br /> <br />Ms. Nelson did not anticipate any of the code changes before the council would affect police <br />enforcement in any way; the issue was the venue in which cases were heard. Omitting particular <br />sections or section from the ordinance would not change the ability of the police to cite people for <br />those offenses, or for those offenses to be heard in Municipal Court; for there to be a limitation, <br />the code must specifically state that those offenses may not be heard in Municipal Court. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly questioned, given Ms. Nelson's remarks, the practical effect of including or not <br />including the section in the code. Ms. Nelson responded that it clarified, for both the community <br />and the police, that the offenses were to be heard in Municipal Court. She clarified that the <br />legislative change allowed police officers to cite offenses under the State statute to Municipal <br />Court. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey indicated he would support the amendment in the case of a tie. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap~ determined from Ms. Nelson that the typical practice of police officers filing felony <br />charges that would go to State court was to file lesser, related charges in State court as well. He <br />further determined that the opposite could occur under State law, but that had not been police <br />practice. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the vote on the amendment was 5:1, Councilor Pap~ voting no. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the amended motion passed, 6:0. <br /> <br />City Manager Johnson said the council would consider Council Bill 4781 by council bill number <br />only. <br /> <br /> Councilor Kelly, seconded by Councilor Pap~, moved that the bill be <br /> approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; the motion carried <br /> unanimously, 6:0, and became Ordinance No. 2045. <br /> <br />MEETING OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF THE CITY OF EUGENE <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey adjourned the meeting of the Eugene City Council and convened a meeting of the <br />Urban Renewal Agency. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 14, 2002 Page 9 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.