My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 01/28/02 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2002
>
CC Minutes - 01/28/02 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:28:08 AM
Creation date
8/1/2005 12:09:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Kelly said that, implicit in his motion, was that the recruiter would have a more full involvement <br />rather than lesser involvement. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Meisner regarding the duties of the committee, Mr. Chouinard <br />said he, or his staff, would work on the job description and profile and submit them to the <br />committee. He said the committee would bring back all issues to the full council. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner was not sure that a committee would save time since the council tended to "nigglingly <br />discuss every word and detail" and all decisions of the committee would be brought before the full <br />council in any event. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor suggested consulting Salem staff, who had just gone through the process of hiring a <br />City Manager. She thought that a committee would save time since the five members of the <br />council could not meet without public notice. She said the committee could meet with the <br />recruiter and bring information back to the full council. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor raised concern that waiting until June to determine a timeline might be too late. She <br />suggested coming up with an earlier date. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman stressed the importance of finding a new city manager as soon as possible. She <br />said the selection process needed to rise above partisan politics. She said there was no need to <br />delay the process and the council was shirking its duty by not pursuing a new city manager <br />immediately and aggressively. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey noted that there would be a period of learning for the person who was eventually <br />hired to get used to their new position. He said there was a benefit for the council to be involved <br />in the learning curve. <br /> <br />Regarding the third person for the committee, Mayor Torrey suggested that the third person <br />needed to complement the officers and provide the broadest cross section of the council. He <br />stressed the importance of striking a balance of opinions. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly suggested that the council officers should choose the third person. <br /> <br /> Ms. Taylor, seconded by Ms. Bettman, moved to amend the motion by <br /> changing the establishment of the timeline from June to April. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said he would not support the amendment. He raised concern about not including <br />new council electees. <br /> <br /> The amendment failed, 5:2; Ms. Taylor and Ms. Bettman voting in favor. <br /> The main motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />C.WORK SESSION: Discussion of Recommendations from the Citizen Charter Review <br /> Committee and Consideration of Election Dates <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 28, 2002 Page 5 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.