My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AMENDED Agenda Packet 5-28-19 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2019
>
05-28-19
>
AMENDED Agenda Packet 5-28-19 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 2:58:23 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:57:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Meeting
City_Council_Meeting_Date
5/28/2019
City_Council_Effective_Date
5/28/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />May 28, 2019, Meeting – Item 4 <br />Community members who are unable to attend the public hearing may submit written comments to <br />councilors online at eugene-or.gov/communitysafety. <br /> May 28, 2019, Meeting – Item 4 <br />2. Why is a payroll tax being considered? <br />A Community Safety Revenue Team was formed to develop a funding recommendation for the City <br />Manager. The Revenue Team included three City Councilors, current and former Budget Committee <br />members, and the Chair of the Police Commission. The revenue team studied many different types of <br />funding options, ranging from levies to a combination of other taxes or fees. You can see the list and <br />analysis of all revenue alternatives considered in the Revenue Team’s Final Report at eugene- <br />or.gov/communitysafeyfunding. Also see the FAQs (question 2) on this web page for a link to key <br />discussion points from the Revenue Team’s recent analysis of two specific alternative funding options: <br />River Road/Santa Clara Annexation and a City personal income tax. <br />The team took into consideration the amount of money needed, the administrative effort and <br />potential costs, and the stability and reliability of the funds. They also considered the fairness of the <br />different options, their feasibility within Eugene and how the option related to the community safety <br />need. The team also reviewed the potential economic, environmental, and social equity impacts – also <br />known as the triple bottom line. They focused on a payroll tax as they concluded their research. <br />In the long term, gross payroll appears to be a sustainable and growing revenue source that can <br />weather economic cycles and keep pace with general and wage inflation impacts on recommended <br />service funding levels. <br />3. What is a payroll tax? <br />Payroll taxes are taxes paid by employees and/or employers and are usually calculated as a percentage <br />of gross payroll or wages. For employees, the tax is percentage of an employee’s total taxable wages. <br />For an employer, the tax is usually a percentage of an employer’s total gross payroll. <br /> <br />4. Who would contribute to the proposed payroll tax and how much would it cost? <br />A payroll tax is levied as a percent of gross payroll earned within the taxing jurisdiction. Entities can <br />enact a payroll tax on employees and/or on employers. <br />At their May 8 Work Session, Councilors were provided three versions of a possible payroll tax and <br />moved forward with an option that included a rate of .0040 for employees and a rate of .0020 for <br />employers located within the City of Eugene. This option also capped the rate for minimum wage <br />earners at .0020. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.