My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 02/13/02 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2002
>
CC Minutes - 02/13/02 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:28:26 AM
Creation date
8/1/2005 12:10:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Meisner said the council needed to learn to exercise fiscal restraint in the future. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly offered a friendly amendment, which was accepted by the second, to make explicit in the <br />motion that there was a $5,000 limit per facility in the allocation of the contingency funds. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor said the request was timely and well-considered. He said it was a wise use of the <br />money and helped the Human Services Commission do its job. He stressed the importance of <br />keeping track of donations of that type so the record could be shown to those who were <br />interested. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ said he would hesitantly support the motion. He reiterated Mr. Meisner's suggestion that <br />the council use more fiscal constraint in the future. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said she would support the motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Fart clarified that the money would be spent within the taxpayer district of Eugene. <br /> <br /> The motion, as amended, passed unanimously. <br /> <br />B.WORK SESSION: Consideration of City Wide Elections <br /> <br />Ms. Walston noted that the current work session was a follow-up session to the council's <br />December 12, 2001, meeting. She said that the council had run out of time at that meeting so <br />there was no specific direction on any proposals. Ms. Walston noted that, since the December <br />12 meeting, the political action committee that was circulating a petition to put citywide elections <br />on the ballot had ceased collecting signatures. She added that there had been public testimony <br />on the issue during the council's last public forum. She said the central theme of the testimony <br />she had heard was related to campaign finance. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said she would vote against any motion that put citywide elections on the ballot. She <br />noted that there had not been enough signatures to put the item on the ballot which suggested to <br />her that there was no grassroots support for the idea. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said that if citywide elections were implemented, a City Councilor would represent <br />140,000 people. She noted that a County commissioner represented 64,500 people, a State <br />House representative represented 57,000 people, and a State Senator represented 114,000 <br />people. She said that ward-based elections allowed a councilor to represent 17,500 people. She <br />said this was a more manageable number and allowed councilors to keep in touch with their <br />constituents and allowed people with moderate means to effectively compete in elections. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman noted that citywide elections/at-large elections had been challenged repeatedly by <br />the Justice Department under the Voting Rights Act of 1965 on the grounds that citywide elections <br />diluted the votes of minority voters. She said that there had been several lawsuits filed against <br />jurisdictions using citywide elections by the Justice Department of the State of Oregon. She said <br />citywide elections would be a backward step for the City of Eugene. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 13, 2002 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.