Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kelly, seconded by Mr. Pap~, moved to direct the City Manager to <br /> schedule initiation of amendments to apply the/ND Nodal Development <br /> Metro Plan diagram designation and/ND Nodal Development overlay zone to <br /> the eight high-priority nodal development areas recommended by the <br /> Planning Commission and described in Attachments C and D. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly thanked the Planning Commission for its work. He stressed the importance of moving <br />ahead with the process of designating nodes. He added that he liked the "urban village" name <br />for nodes since it would mean more to citizens. <br /> <br />Mr. Fart suggested a meeting with the mayor and Ms. Nathanson to discuss the Royal Node and <br />how to allay local concerns over nodal development. He opined that the proposed overlay zone <br />would actually increase property values in the area. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman expressed her appreciation of the Planning Commission focusing on opportunities. <br />She said she would support the motion but stressed the importance of moving forward expediently <br />in designating more nodes. <br /> <br /> The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Kelly, moved to direct the City Manager to <br /> include amendments to the/ND Nodal Development Overlay Zone to achieve <br /> an average overall residential density of 12 units per net acre as part of the <br /> Spring 2002 amendments to the Eugene Land Use Code. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman noted the origin of the concept in the work done at the request of the mayor by the <br />Friends of Eugene, the Chamber of Commerce, Neighborhood Leaders Council, and the Lane <br />County Homebuilders Association. An average overall density of 12 units per acre was common <br />to two strongly supported scenarios that came out of that work. Participants agreed that density <br />was valuable to preserving existing residential land, and had discussed down zoning existing <br />residential land to make up the needed density elsewhere. In addition, participants discussed <br />opportunity mapping for additional density at other sites in the community. Another value <br />expressed by participants was to provide a mix of housing types, rather than achieving density by <br />subdividing lots in existing neighborhoods. The approach also maintained neighborhood integrity <br />and property values. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ raised concern that the motion would not be appropriate for all nodes. <br /> <br />Mr. Belcher stressed that 12 residential units per acre was needed to make transit work. He said <br />the goal of nodal development was to provide services to citizens without their having to drive. <br />He added that 12 residential units per acre was not particularly dense. <br /> <br />Ms. Childs said the fundamental needs of nodes would require 12 residential units per acre. She <br />said Ms. Bettman's motion provided more flexibility than the existing code provided. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Pap~ regarding whether the character of neighborhoods would <br />be changed to achieve an average of 12 residential units per acre, Ms. Childs noted that there <br />could be a mix of residential zone densities within a node that could equal out to the <br />recommended average. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 20, 2002 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />