Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Nathanson asked about the potential of working with the Eugene Water & Electric Board <br />(EWEB) on joint land acquisition and development, should the utility be relocating from its site. <br />She thought the two agencies had similar needs and questioned whether there were efficiencies <br />to be gained from a joint development approach. Mr. Carlson said it was possible, noting that <br />EWEB recently exercised an option to purchase a 25-acre site at 1st Avenue and Seneca Road. <br />He believed that the Public Works master planning indicated that the department needed the <br />entire Roosevelt site. Mr. Corey concurred. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said that even if the council acted tonight, construction would be two years out. He was <br />surprised that there was no commercial tilt-up space on the market to which staff could be <br />temporarily moved for $100,000. He requested further exploration of the possibility. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Kelly, Mr. Svendsen clarified that the building was not <br />proposed to be built at essential services level 4; it was at level 3. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor believed the purview of the Police Commission was policy rather than such <br />expenditures. She determined from Mr. Svendsen that staff worked full-time in the basement. <br />She agreed with Mr. Rayor that the proposal was premature and the council should postpone <br />action until after the election in May 2002. Ms. Taylor said if the City Council was going to <br />consider the use of Fire Station 1 for the functions under discussion, it would have to wait until <br />after the election. She liked the idea of temporary facilities and liked the idea of collocation. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said the council should give the staff an answer quickly. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor liked Scheme A, and suggested a potential phasing approach over 20 years using the <br />layout of that scheme. He advised that the remaining schemes be discarded. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman was interested in establishing a cost cap for any new construction. She wanted to <br />move all staff out the basement and use it for storage only. She suggested that the functions now <br />in the basement be relocated to the City-owned Sears building on a temporary basis. <br /> <br />Regarding the issue of temporary space, Mr. Svendsen said that the problem with that approach <br />was the extremely high level of construction detail to completely separate the lab functions and <br />stations from each other. It was not cost-effective to find generic space. Regarding the Sears <br />building, Mr. Penwell added that staff estimated it would cost $7 million to $10 million to renovate <br />the Sears building, and noted that staff had presented that analysis to the City Council previously. <br />There are mechanical and electrical requirements needed for the forensics component of use, <br />and the building would have to be gutted and rebuilt as it did not have an up-to-date functioning <br />mechanical and electrical system. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner opposed the staff-suggested motion as being premature. He did not want to send the <br />voters a fire bond if the City had money available to build the forensics facility. He liked Mr. Farr's <br />suggestion to acquire a land bank site for single-wide trailers. He also liked the idea of temporary <br />space as suggested by Mr. Kelly, and questioned if staff had looked into modular buildings. Mr. <br />Meisner was not enthusiastic about the Sears building for this use. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 7:53 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 8, 2002 Page 10 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />