Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Pap~ moved to continue the meeting to a date certain. The motion died <br /> for lack of a second. <br /> <br /> The main motion passed, 7:1; Mr. Fart voting no. <br />Mr. Kelly believed it would take staff some time to develop rules implementing the resolution, and <br />he thought there was merit in staff sending those rules out to the council for comment. <br /> <br />Mr. Fart reiterated that the council established a flawed system, and did so "on the fly." <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman appreciated the work the council had done, disagreeing it was done "on the fly," <br />considering the discussions at the previous work sessions. She looked forward to seeing how the <br />program operated. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ indicated he would likely propose that the resolution include a sunset date that followed <br />the general election of 2004. <br /> <br />Speaking to Mr. Fart, Mr. Meisner noted that C&E reports, when established, were opposed by <br />some on a free speech basis, but he did not think requiring people to report campaign <br />contributions was a violation of free speech. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor agreed with Ms. Bettman that the council had not worked "on the fly." He thought the <br />process had been orderly. He said that "you either believe stuff or you don't" and he preferred to <br />have less discussion and just address the amendments. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly thanked everyone, including legal counsel, Ms. Walston, the councilors, and the mayor <br />for the completion of what had been a long process. He anticipated further fine-tuning of the <br />program and also looked forward to see how it worked in practice. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />James R.. Carlson <br />City Manager pro rem <br /> <br />(Recorded by Kimberly Young) <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 10, 2002 Page 9 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />