Laserfiche WebLink
2018 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Appendix B Page 17 of 48 <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed <br />Date <br />Time <br />Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />5/8/18 5/29/18 21 Performance RP was upset that an animal control <br />officer did not address a dog at large <br />issue in a city park. <br />Supervisor learned that the officer was in the middle of a contact <br />when RP approached him, when he finished the contacted and <br />went to address the issue the people involved had left the area. <br />RP did not return messages left by the Supervisor. <br />5/8/18 5/22/18 14 Performance RP was upset that he did not get a <br />response from EPD when he called to <br />report that his daughter's ex-boyfriend, <br />who had threatened RP's family, was <br />parked outside his home. <br />Supervisor reviewed calls made by RP's wife and found two calls <br />with her reporting the threats. A third call letting them know that <br />the suspect had left the area and no response was needed. <br />Supervisor spoke with RP about the calls and what EPD call takers <br />had done in the situation. <br />5/8/18 5/29/18 21 Performance RP was unhappy about how a officer <br />handled a call for service about stalking <br />by her ex. <br />Review of the body cam found that the officer did a complete <br />and professional investigation into the issue, finding no criminal <br />issue at this time. The officer spent time to provide RP with other <br />ideas on how to document the issue she was having. Sgt. spoke <br />with RP about his finding <br />5/9/18 5/14/18 5 Inquiry During the course of his arrest RP stated <br />that officers were racist and only <br />arrested him because he was black. <br />Lt. learned that RP was arrested with probable cause for stealing <br />a chainsaw from a construction site. <br />5/11/18 6/20/18 39 Service Level RP was unhappy that officer never <br />showed up about an issue with her <br />neighbors, even though she had <br />witnesses waiting to speak with them. <br />Sgt. found that because of call activity at the time an officer was <br />not dispatched until many hours later. After knocking three times <br />the officer left knowing that RP was probably sleeping. RP did <br />not return calls made by the Sgt. <br />5/11/18 6/13/18 32 Policy RP was unhappy that officers were <br />dispatched and not just Cahoots in <br />response for her call for service for help <br />with her son. <br />Supervisor reviewed the call and found that with in the <br />information provided in the call the call taker followed correct <br />procedure in dispatching officers. Supervisor spoke with RP and <br />explained how and why officers are dispatched vs. when only <br />Cahoots can be dispatched. <br />5/11/18 6/6/18 25 Inquiry RP was unhappy that an officer told his <br />employer medical information about RP <br />that RP did not authorize. <br />Review of body-worn cameras, police reports and the Civil Rights <br />HIPPA website found that the officer followed guidelines for <br />police personnel while speaking with the employer. Sgt. spoke <br />with RP about the findings. <br />5/15/18 6/20/18 35 Inquiry RP was unhappy with how an incident <br />with her husband and his employer was <br />handled. <br />Lt. found that no crime was committed against RP's husband and <br />that officers followed correct procedure in investigation the <br />situation. RP was unhappy with the findings. <br />June 19, 2019, Work Session – Item 2