Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT C <br /> <br />M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council and Eugene Water & Electric Board of Commissioners <br />Joint Meeting <br />th <br />Eugene Water & Electric Board—500 East 4 Avenue—Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br /> November 15, 2006 <br /> 12:15 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Jennifer Solomon, Andrea Ortiz, David Kelly, Betty Taylor, Gary Papé, <br />Bonny Bettman, George Poling, Chris Pryor. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: President Sandra Bishop; Vice President Mel Menegat; Ron Farmer, John <br />Simpson. <br /> <br /> <br />A. TOUR AND WORK SESSION: <br />Tour of Eugene Water & Electric Board Riverfront Site and Discussion of Relocation <br />Project <br /> <br />Prior to assembling in the Training Center in the Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) Community <br />Center, councilors, commissioners, EWEB staff, City staff, representatives of the press, and members of the <br />public were taken on a tour of the EWEB building housing the electric and water utility operations, EWEB <br />yards, and steam plant by EWEB project manager Ken Beeson. <br /> <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. <br /> <br />President Sandra Bishop called the meeting of the Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) of Commission- <br />ers to order. She introduced members of the board present, noting the absence of Commissioner Patrick <br />Lanning. <br /> <br />Mr. Berggren introduced the topic of discussion. He said the board worked through a deliberative process to <br />reach the conclusion that EWEB needed to move and upgrade its operational facilities from the current site. <br />The board also believed that the current site could be used for higher and better uses than it currently <br />supported. Mr. Berggren said the issues remaining to be addressed by the board were largely related to the <br />economic feasibility of making the move, and the future of the current site was an issue because EWEB <br />would need the revenues from the sale of the site to accomplish the move. The board would have to decide if <br />the revenues realized from the property were sufficient in the February-March 2007 time period. Mr. <br />Berggren said that EWEB was also facing the issue of cost escalation, and that staff was working with its <br />contractors to bring costs in line with the original estimates, but there were no assurances. <br /> <br />Mr. Beeson provided an overview of the Roosevelt Project using an aerial photograph of the site and a site <br />plan. He emphasized the principles of performance, sustainability, and economy, and anticipated that the <br />building designed for the site would be LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certified. <br />He summarized the tentative project schedule, suggesting that the two-year construction period could begin <br />in 2007. Mr. Beeson said staff was working to finalize the project design and in March-April 2007 would <br />have final project estimates to include in a bond measure for consideration by the board and ultimately, the <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council/ November 15, 2006 Page 1 <br /> Eugene Water & Electric Board of Commissioners <br /> <br />