My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AMENDED Agenda Packet 6-24-19 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2019
>
06-24-19
>
AMENDED Agenda Packet 6-24-19 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2019 4:39:07 PM
Creation date
6/25/2019 4:33:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Meeting
City_Council_Meeting_Date
6/24/2019
City_Council_Effective_Date
6/24/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
278
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES – Eugene City Council Work Session May 20, 2019 Page 3 <br />•Councilor Syrett – said she would support an extension and would like to clarify the amountof time; thought two weeks would be preferable; noted council received a memo from thegroup’s chair indicating that the recruitment did not yield the diversity desired by thecommittee. <br />MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Semple, seconded by Councilor Syrett, moved to reopen the recruitment for the Human Rights Commission candidates through close of business on May 31, 2019. PASSED 7:1. Councilor Taylor opposed. <br />•Councilor Taylor – asked for clarification about whether a homeowner could remove a treein the park strip area between the sidewalk and the curb. <br />•Councilor Zelenka – noted concerns from his ward about removing people who are campingon the park strip; would like to give residents the authority to remove someone camping onthat strip. <br />•Councilor Evans – said he felt it was important to support the children taking action toprotect the environment in the Juliana case and introduced a resolution of support for theircase; said he felt the children’s case was in alignment with the City’s stated values. <br />•Councilor Clark – expressed opposition to the resolution; noted that while he admired theinitiative of the children to get involved in something they believe in, he does not supportthe trust doctrine. <br />•Councilor Pryor – expressed support for all the “therefores” within the resolution. <br />MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Evans, seconded by Councilor Syrett, moved to adopt a resolution calling for support of the Juliana v. U.S. Youth Plaintiffs and the science-based recovery plan they seek. PASSED 7:1, Councilor Clark opposed. <br />•Councilor Semple – shared that the idea to adopt a resolution supporting a Green New Dealwas proposed to her by the South Eugene High School Earth Guardians 350; said she felt theresolution was important in terms of making a commitment to the City’s environmental andeconomic future. <br />•Councilor Syrett – said she was especially supportive of the portions of the resolution thatpertain to labor, protecting the sovereign rights of tribal nations, and mitigating deeplyentrenched inequalities and biases. <br />•Councilor Pryor – agreed with Councilor Syrett; wanted to talk about the resolution’s“therefores” when council has not discussed many of the subjects mentioned; could notsupport without more conversation. <br />•Councilor Clark – supported some of the overarching ideas but found others nonsensicaland/or untenable. <br />•Mayor Vinis – noted that the resolution is an aspirational document, noting that it isappropriate to lend support to its values without a discussion. <br />•Councilor Zelenka – said he was not sure he supported all the details but supported theoverall resolution and the sentiment. <br />•Councilor Clark – cautioned against adopting a resolution lightly that would support awholesale change in the country’s economy. <br />MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Semple, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to adopt a resolution calling on the federal government to pass a Green New Deal <br />PASSED 6:2, councilors Clark and Pryor opposed. <br />June 24, 2019, Meeting – Item 3A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.