Laserfiche WebLink
City Manager Carlson said that the council would consider Council Bill 4795 by number only. <br /> <br /> Councilor Kelly, seconded by Councilor Pap~, moved that the bill be <br /> approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; the motion passed, 5:3; <br /> councilors Kelly, Taylor, and Bettman voting no, and the bill became <br /> Ordinance No. 20258. <br /> <br />City Manager Carlson said that the council would consider Council Bill 4796, an ordinance <br />amending the West Eugene Wetlands Plan to redesignate property within the modified project <br />alignment of the West Eugene Parkway from Protect and Restore to Planned Transportation <br />Corridor; adopting a severability clause; and providing an effective date; and replacement Exhibit <br />B, Findings. <br /> <br /> Councilor Kelly, seconded by Councilor Pap~, moved that the bill, with the <br /> unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by council bill <br /> number only, and that enactment be considered at this time. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for comments on the motion. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly spoke against the motion because ©D©T had not identified how much of the <br />wetlands would be mitigated or the area where mitigation would occur. He had no sense of <br />whether it was possible to mitigate the wetlands in question because there was no information <br />provided to the council regarding the issue. He asked what would happen if ©D©T was unable to <br />find enough land to mitigate upon. He also opposed the motion because it would require a waiver <br />of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) policy related to the use of properties purchased with <br />Land and Water Conservation Funds. He believed that would set a national precedent for taking <br />lands purchased for preservation for use as a roadway. Finally, Councilor Kelly believed there <br />was solid biological information in the record that indicated that west of Beltline, the project would <br />do irreparable harm to the largest remaining contiguous wetlands. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman agreed with Councilor Kelly's comments. She spoke of how essential water <br />was to human life, and said that the federal government recognized that fact through the passage <br />of the Clean Water Act. The act was not just for animals and plants, it was for human beings, <br />because the wetlands served the function of filtering water, restoring the aquifer, and controlling <br />flooding. If the WEWP was amended to accommodate the parkway, there was no such thing as <br />protection for wetlands. With enough momentum and money, any environmental protections <br />could be reversed. She said that the amendment was not consistent with applicable plans and <br />policies. <br /> <br />Councilor Fart questioned what would happen if every time the voters voted, the council <br />discussed whether or not to uphold the will of the voters. He suggested that chaos would result. <br />He repeated that credibility was an issue; the voters had spoken, and the council should facilitate <br />construction of the parkway. <br /> <br />Councilor Rayor believed he had acted to facilitate the parkway by working to push the solutions <br />preferred by the Environmental Protection Agency. Those solutions were rejected. He said that <br />the area that would be affected contained several species of interest, both animal and plant. He <br />cited Bradshaw's Iomatium and Kincaid's lupine as examples of plant species of interest. <br />Councilor Rayor suggested the voters should have voted to overturn the ordinances implementing <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 8, 2002 Page 13 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />