Laserfiche WebLink
3.Consent Calendar <br /> <br /> A. Approval of Council Minutes <br /> May 22, 2002, Work Session <br /> May 29, 2002, Work Session <br /> June 10, 2002, Work Session <br /> June 10, 2002, City Council Meeting <br /> B. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda <br /> C. Approval of Resolution 4726, Approving the Charter and Agreement of the Lane <br /> Council of Governments <br /> D. Approval of Resolution 4727 Delegating Authority to Declare Official Intent to <br /> Reimburse Expenditures <br /> <br /> Councilor Kelly, seconded by Councilor Pap~, moved to approve the items on <br /> the Consent Calendar. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly pulled Item A. He offered corrections to the minutes of May 29, noting Councilor <br />Rayor was incorrectly listed as both present and absent; he was absent. Regarding the work <br />session minutes of June 10, he asked that the reference to the "initial levy" in the last paragraph <br />on page 3 be changed to the "initial youth levy." He also asked that the reference to distinctive <br />judicial process in paragraph 8 on page 6 of the same minutes be changed to "distinctive judicial <br />evaluation process." <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman also pulled Item A and asked that Item C be pulled. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman noted that "follow" was misspelled "following" in paragraph 1 of page 6 of the <br />work session minutes of May 29. She also asked that paragraph 8 on page 2 of the May 29 <br />minutes be revised to read (italicized text added; struck text deleted): "...could be listed as a <br />minor change on a separate ballot as a separate measure." Referring to the June 10 work <br />session minutes, Councilor Bettman asked that the reference to "school councilors" in paragraph <br />3 on page 4 be changed to "school counselors." She also asked that the second sentence in <br />paragraph 6 on page '12 be replaced with the following: "Could it be interpreted as a strong <br />preference for an internal candidate?" <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey determined that there were no objections to the changes offered by Councilor Kelly <br />or Councilor Bettman. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion, with the exception of Item C, passed unanimously, <br /> 8:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked that Item C, a resolution approving the charter and agreement of the <br />Lane Council of Governments (LCOG), be tabled pending a council work session on issues <br />related to LCOG. She thought a work session would help to address some issues of concern that <br />had been raised by constituents to her over the years. She termed LCOG a "quasi-governmental <br />agency" that put an insulating layer between the elected representatives of a jurisdiction and the <br />expenditure of funds. She said it created an extra level of bureaucracy, which decreased <br />accountability. Councilor Bettman pointed out that the council was not receiving regular reports <br />from its representatives to the LCOG Board regarding the decisions the board made. She cited <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 8, 2002 Page 3 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />