Laserfiche WebLink
Charlotte Bim, 731 Poltava Street, Springfield, said she was happy that the City was considering <br />a fair market rate for parking on the park lands. <br /> <br />David Sonicson, 2435 Skyline Boulevard, hoped the ordinance would channel more money into <br />the park. He expressed appreciation for Parks staff's work in the park area to monitor the impact <br />of football fans traveling through the park. He noted that the University of Oregon only <br />remunerated $300 per football game for 425 spaces across the street from the new entrance to <br />the stadium while it charged more than double the rates than City staff were proposing for its <br />parking. He urged the council to ask for more remuneration for those spaces, and opined that the <br />University was not in a position to deny a request of that nature. <br /> <br />There being no other requests to speak, Mayor Torrey closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly said he was opposed to the proposed ordinance because it did not make a <br />distinction between market rate parking for spots on City property during football games and other <br />types of parking uses. He said a blanket lifting of parking maximums would raise Hult parking and <br />generate a great deal of public ill will for very little revenue gain. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman also opposed the ordinance. She said she was opposed to not charging <br />market rates for parking for non-city events. She said the ordinance was "piecemeal" and did not <br />provide specifics as to who would be charged and who would not. She added that it created an <br />uneven playing field in terms of the WISTEC lot, the Lane Transit District bus lot, Leo Harris <br />Parkway, and the BMX facility. She said the City would be bestowing a financial benefit on certain <br />entities that other organizations had no ability to access. She opined that this would be a tax <br />subsidy to those entities. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said she was also against the proposed ordinance because the revenue <br />gained from parking would go to the Parks and Open Space Division. She said she would rather <br />see the money go to the Parking Fund. She raised concern that giving parking revenue to the <br />division would create an incentive for staff to create more parking lots on park land. <br /> <br />City Manager Carlson pointed out that nothing in the ordinance said where the money would go. <br />He said action by the council would have to be taken either through the budget or supplemental <br />budget process to decide where the revenue would go. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor said the City should charge more for parking on City park land. She added her <br />opinion that the Cuthbert Amphitheater, Hult Center, and Eugene Celebration events should be <br />exempt from the ordinance. She raised concern over making it more difficult for citizens to <br />participate in cultural events. <br /> <br />Councilor Rayor raised concern that the ordinance specified amounts and where the revenue <br />would go. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap8 said the City should charge market rate for parking wherever it is located. He <br />said, at times when the City was strapped for money, the City should be getting market rate for all <br />of its parking. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman agreed with Councilor PapS's comments but stressed that the ordinance before <br />the council would not achieve what he wanted. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 22, 2002 Page 10 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />