Laserfiche WebLink
property tax. He said a property tax, for purposes of Measure 5, was defined as one that was <br />imposed directly on the property itself or one that was imposed on the property owner as a direct <br />consequence of ownership. He said the fee in question would not be imposed either on the <br />property or on the property owner. He said it would only be imposed when use of the property <br />generated use of the transportation system. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Mike Broadsword, 3450 Strathmore Place, said the need for a transportation system <br />maintenance fee had been established by City staff. He said staff had reached the determination <br />of ramping up to $8 million per year to keep up with road maintenance. He said the majority of the <br />roads in Eugene were reaching the end of their economic life as well as facing traffic increases <br />and population growth. He stressed the importance of being proactive in maintaining roads since <br />it would cost more to do it later. <br /> <br />Terry Connolly, Eugene Chamber of Commerce, said it was difficult to support the fee until there <br />had been a public hearing on the proposed fuel tax. He noted that there was a serious problem <br />facing the community and stressed the importance of facing that problem in the most fiscally <br />responsive way. <br /> <br />Jennifer Solomon, 2005 Lemuria Street, expressed her support for the ordinance. She said <br />providing a safe and efficient transportation system was an essential role of city government. She <br />said the transportation system maintenance fee was a fair and equitable means to address the <br />situation of the City's deteriorating streets. She urged the council to move forward on the issue. <br />She noted that the cost of the preservation backlog had already increased substantially. <br /> <br />Russell Styles, 2015 Eastwood Lane, raised concern that non-local traffic passed through his <br />local community street. He noted that 2,400 vehicles used his street daily, resulting in severe <br />road damage to a street that, until recently, had not been maintained by the City. He commented <br />that he would be very angry if the City demanded that he share in the cost of maintaining his <br />street since it had done nothing to enforce the "local traffic only" rule that had been in effect. He <br />said the City should use discretionary funds to pay for street preservation. <br /> <br />Gary Heldt, 3477 Onyx Street, supported the proposed plan but asked that no action be taken <br />until public hearings were held for both the current proposal and the proposed fuel tax. He added <br />his opinion that the fee included too much administrative overhead. <br /> <br />David Monk, 3720 Emerald Street, submitted a written statement from the Southeast Neighbors <br />neighborhood association. He said that delayed and deferred road maintenance cost twice as <br />much as preventative maintenance. He said the association was opposed to the street <br />maintenance fee since the citizens of the city had not been given enough background information <br />regarding the proposed fee. He said the fee, in part, was due to over-commitment of funds to <br />new road and highway projects outlined in the TransPlan. <br /> <br />There being no other requests to speak, Mayor Torrey closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly stressed the importance of keeping Eugene's gas tax similar to Springfield's. He <br />expressed concern that a gas tax as a sole funding source was not politically viable since it would <br />mean a 12-13 cent per gallon tax, which would create an uneven playing field for Eugene <br />businesses that would have to charge more for gas than businesses outside the city limits. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 22, 2002 Page 7 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />