Laserfiche WebLink
MovingAhead Spring 2019 Outreach Summary 43 <br /> I think the low travel time savings means that fares would be low, but travel time would <br />increase or stay the same. I am interested in shorter waiting times. <br /> I think that in theory this would be effective but I do not think it would provide the necessary <br />amount of routes that the public requires. <br /> I think that commuters will be prioritized also. Because not everyone can afford to use cars in <br />the community. Waiting for every 30 minutes on buses is too long. Specially if you need to make <br />connections going to work. I think bus routes need to be always on scheduled and less wait time <br />on intervals. <br /> I don't think this is worth the investment. TRAVEL TIME- doesn't do much to help. INCREASE IN <br />RIDERSHIP- does not do much to help. SAFETY- does not do much to help. LITERALLY THOSE ARE <br />THE MAIN THINGS PEOPLE ARE ASKING FOR THAT THIS PROJECT IS SUPPOSED TO DO THE MOST <br />ABOUT. Those points do not support project criteria well- which indicates that this plan literally <br />does not support its own self and that is a big red flag. Why would we waste money this just to <br />have to come back later and change it since those 3 issues are going to continue to be a <br />problem? No thank you, sir. <br /> I don't particularly like this package as compared to package A, there are more trees and more <br />acres that are impacted. I also do not believe this is Enough to keep up with the growth of <br />Eugene. <br /> I am a regular bus rider, and cyclist in addition to driving my car. I would prefer more <br />improvements for pedestrians and cyclists. <br /> Doesn't seem to meet goals, while is less expensive <br /> Concern re: relatively lower level of improvements for safety of bike/ped users, less impact for <br />disadvantaged riders, and overall less impact on ridership. <br /> Busses need to connect better to get High school students to school. There is a 15 minute walk <br />from W 11th to 18th for Churchill students. <br /> Also, my work is on W 11th and I live By W 7th so I am on the bus line. The empty bus passes by <br />me but it is not in service I am unable to get to work by 6:00. AM. Also the cost should be <br />lowered or a contract should be made with businesses on the line so it could be more affordale. <br />Look to Corvalis! <br /> bus routes with long time waits between buses is painful if there is inclemency or lack of seating <br />while waiting. <br /> Because of the small ridership increase. We need to get people out of their cars <br />Support <br />Low impact in displacement <br /> Less impact on trees. <br /> It seems pretty neutral and wouldn't impact my life very much. <br /> I see the number of trees, families and businesses negatively impacted by this and it makes me <br />horribly sad. This is the easiest pill to swallow. <br /> Better chance of building public support <br /> Low cost with some performance gain <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1