Laserfiche WebLink
MovingAhead Spring 2019 Outreach Summary 45 <br />would make sense to have an intermediary step for many of the routes. It sounds like this would <br />be easier to implement more quickly and cheaply, and I think the benefit per cost of this actually <br />makes it worthwhile for several EmX-potential routes before expanding the EmX down those <br />routes. <br /> I think that the enhanced corridor package would be an absolutely fantastic option for this <br />community's baseline goals for improving public transit and accessibility over the medium term. <br />I think that this community values public transit and accessibility more than is deserving of <br />achieving our baseline goals. <br /> I think it best fits all members of our community <br /> I like that this option focuses on people who need transportation options the most. Given the <br />number of cars heading to LCC, improving service here is important, and since many students <br />are low income and young, providing good options makes sense. I'm not sure about Hwy 99. <br />There is next to no housing on the route, so people have to walk to access the improved service <br />since housing is concentrated further back. Coburg Road is a beast. I'd love to see EmX there, <br />dedicated bike lanes and a whole lot less auto traffic. River Road is so wide, it seems perfect for <br />EmX. I see this package as ho hum. Some things to like, but I'd prefer more aggressive options. <br /> I like that there's no additional cost, but don't want bus stops to be consolidated along Coburg <br />Rd. <br /> I appreciate the increase in service across all major corridors. It is low impact and promotes <br />accessible and affordable improvements. BUT, I think we can do more. <br /> Having better EMX along river road and out to LCC would really benefit the community and <br />create a much larger section of the community easily accessible by bus. <br /> Doesn't seem to factor in long term ridership projections. If ridership is growing modestly, this <br />plans seems appropriate. <br /> Cost effectiveness. Focuses on Hwy 99, which is most important. <br /> Considering the cost savings relative to other plans, the ride time improvements and ridership <br />increase seem like a good value, if not the ultimate solution. <br /> Because it will make people safer and buses safer. <br /> because it is a smart investment for the community. I do think we need a MLK jr. blvd route is <br />needed where i live. <br /> Because it cost less to build and operate. <br /> Because I like they way it works <br /> any move ahead is better than none <br /> A good budget oriented option that still included much needed improvements. Might not be <br />good enough to meet the future public transportation needs of the city. <br /> <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1