My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 7-15-19 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
City Council
>
2019
>
07-15-19
>
Agenda Packet 7-15-19 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2019 4:50:41 PM
Creation date
7/5/2019 4:41:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Work Session
City_Council_Meeting_Date
7/15/2019
City_Council_Effective_Date
7/15/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MovingAhead Spring 2019 Outreach Summary 51 <br /> does not address bicycle/pedestrian safety as high priority <br /> DO NOT RELOCATE THE RIVER RD STATION!!! The High School students need it where it is!!! <br /> concerned about very little investment along Coburg Road which needs something. <br /> Coburg Rd is one of the main traffic snarls in the city. It needs to be included. <br /> Coburg Rd and MLK wouldn't see any investments, and they are in the heart of our regional <br />community and provide key connections. <br /> Because i am wanting enhanced option to be considered not this option. <br /> An EMX extension into only northwest Eugene would not provide the benefits to northeast and <br />south Eugene, where ridership would be most likely to gain. <br /> Adds EmX, but is worse than the enhanced corridor only option. No deal. <br />Support <br /> West Eugene and Santa Clara are largely ignored in city development and I like that this plan <br />focuses on improving the transportation issues in those areas. <br /> We need an economically diverse ridership. <br /> This option does have the least capital expense cost paired with the fewest street parking sites <br />effected. <br /> The percent investment in corridors with more marginalized populations is super important and <br />compelling. A new EMX route is much needed, and River Road seems like the right place to start. <br />Would like to see more impact across the city and improvements for peds/bikes. <br /> still some improvement is better than none <br /> Something is better than nothing <br /> Seems to serve a congested and economically depressed area of the city. <br /> Negative: Systemwide Annual Ridership Increase <br /> Positive: Percent of Investment in Corridors with Higher Level of Disadvantaged Population <br /> Like the focus on low income neighborhoods, but is it true that if you build it, they will come? <br /> like investment in low income communities <br /> Its great that River road is looking at Emx in this plan. I think 99 would also benefit from <br />something like this. <br /> It works well for my community <br /> It sounds like it would work just fine for the areas included. <br /> It sounds helpful <br /> It is less comprehensive than the other packages, but prioritizes areas where this could benefit <br />riders getting to where they need quickly, who may rely on public transit over other <br />communities. <br /> I use the Coburg corridor frequently. <br /> I like this package for the expansion of services to those who most need those services. <br /> I like this one - EmX on River Road would be super helpful. High low socio-economic area. <br />Moderate investment. We can always invest more if we want. <br /> I like the Emx service on River Road <br /> Honestly, it’s because I live in the River Rd area (off NW Expressway). And it’s lower impact on <br />trees, residents & businesses. <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.