Laserfiche WebLink
MovingAhead Spring 2019 Outreach Summary 54 <br /> This reflects a better investment on many of the identified corridors but leaves out the life line <br />to LCC. We need the community college to be better connected to the community to be able to <br />support building the workforce Lane County needs to thrive. <br /> This does not solve the problems with the other corridors. <br /> There is a lack of detail in the options. Hard for me to know how this really impacts me as the <br />individual. My biggest concern is 30th ave as I live on the hill so I am not sure I want it messed <br />with until I get more details as to how it would really play out. <br /> The difference between Package A and Package B are huge in terms of impact on trees. <br />Otherwise, criteria seems similar, except 30th Ave/LCC route would remain unimproved. I'm <br />confused why annual operating costs are less for Package C than for Package B. Is it because <br />there would be less maintenance required on the 30th/LCC route? <br /> The Coburg Road/Ferry Street area needs an overall look at the intersection forms as it fails <br />today. The signals need to be replaced with roundabouts and then I would support EmX on <br />those roadways. 30th Avenue is fine in my opinion and we do not need to waste funds for that <br />corridor. Beltline is actually where we need EmX. I feel if there was an EmX facility on Beltline, it <br />could dramatically improve the congestion issues on Beltline. I don't understand why we are <br />creating EmX facilities on our highly used transit routes when the EmX buses do not hold more <br />people than the standard buses. The amount of stops for EmX also seem to act more like a <br />regular bus service instead of rapid service. The EmX stations need to be much further apart <br />with regular bus service supplementing with the frequent stops. <br /> Still not enough help for Hwy 99. <br /> Road construction and making improvements is kind of a pain for everyone impacted by it. I <br />guess I feel if we are going to suffer through the impacts of construction, we should go all the <br />way. To do all this and only achieve moderate ratings on most criteria just feels kind of wasteful. <br /> Prioritizes MLK over 30th Ave. Not reasonable. <br /> Placing an EMX corridor on Coburg Rd demonstrates that you have not surveyed the majority of <br />the population who reside in the area.. <br /> Personally, I would love to see a bus on 30th to LCC, and I don't really grasp why it is designated <br />as a no-build zone. If a route like that is possible, I would love to see it happen. <br /> Once again, specific definitions not met. Only gauge generalizations which will cost 181 million <br />dollars. <br /> OK, but not my preference for investment. I'd rather see EmX on Hwy 99, as well as River Road <br /> Not necessary and EMX will just plug up River Road.. <br /> Need to address all corridors. <br /> need EmX on all corridors except 30th <br /> low incease in ridership <br /> Leaves out major areas <br /> LCC students struggle financially as it currently is. Let's at least do something to make it easier <br />for them to get a quality, affordable education. <br /> LCC is an important part of the community, and should be more accessible by public transit. <br /> Its not EMX <br /> It still doesn't do much to address bike and ped safety. I also worry about political push-back if <br />you have to relocate businesses. <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1