Laserfiche WebLink
MovingAhead Spring 2019 Outreach Summary 60 <br />Performance against criteria <br /> While this option has a lower annual cost, the stats make it seems like the added cost and <br />improvements to the line would take away from plans for the river road and hwy 99 line. (lower <br />community vision and ridership increase even though there's an extra line being improved) <br /> While I know this includes the 30th to LCC I don't know if this is much improvement on package <br />B and what the overall difference in ridership and time between downtown and LCC would be. <br /> Unclear why Package C with more investment would have lower ridership increase compared to <br />Package B. <br /> This option in my mind is neutral because I have concerns about the lack of EMX service along <br />the other corridors, yet the community rated River Road as the most vital for EMX service. <br /> There is a lack of detail in the options. Hard for me to know how this really impacts me as the <br />individual. My biggest concern is 30th ave as I live on the hill so I am not sure I want it messed <br />with until I get more details as to how it would really play out. <br /> Takes out a lot more trees and serves 10% fewer disadvantaged population, but the long term <br />yearly cost is much better. <br /> Similar issues as package B. Should be contemplating EmX, particularity in the Highway 99 <br />corridor, so can acquire ROW BEFORE development occurs not after (don't replicate the <br />problem that faces the Coburg Road corridor <br /> Should not be considered at all as it involves more EMX and also changes to Coburg Rd that <br />don’t involve auto traffic improvement. <br /> Same package as B but $20M increase and expanding to LCC, 55k ridership decease between <br />this and Package B is a concern. Not worth the price increase. <br /> River Rd should have EMX. There already is a bike path option, so no more bike paths needed. <br />Better do something about unleashed dogs on that pathway. The only bike crash I had in my life <br />was on the river bike path commuting to work with some bad dog parents and an unleashed <br />dog. Broke my foot, glasses, and totaled my bike. No harm to the dog. <br /> Not sure the investment in the 30th ave LCC corridor pays off. <br /> Not a fan of construction slow downs <br /> low increase in ridership <br /> Its not EMX <br /> It serves a smaller ridership, it impacts more trees, impacts more parking spaces, serves only <br />68% of disadvantaged population, and capital cost more than Enhanced Corridor, Package A, or <br />Package B. <br /> In favor= for those who need the bus. Not in favor of minimal improvement for bikes & peds (if <br />I’m reading the white dots as the numbers). Impact on trees also is high (not good). <br /> Ignores possibility/probability of increased enrollment and round-the-clock activity at LCC. <br />Traditional school hours and commute hours will disappear. <br /> I would still prefer an EmX extension for Coburg Road. <br /> i would rather see EmX everywhere. <br /> I support the recommended investments in River Road, Coburg Rd, Hwy 99, and MLK. However, <br />I come down opposing this project because investing in any sort of transit on Amazon Parkway <br />(vs. parallel corridors Hilyard and Willamette) is a waste of money that misses destinations and <br />is the epitome of symbolic transit that serves political interests instead of riders. The best <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1