Laserfiche WebLink
MovingAhead Spring 2019 Outreach Summary 62 <br /> This also is my other favorite. I like the bold, progressive, proactive approach and think we <br />should make a big investment and commitment in the community. <br /> Something for everyone! <br /> Serves LCC and retains Emx on River Road. <br /> Seems fairly balanced <br /> Provides citywide upgrades but doesn't show how often transportation will be available. I would <br />like to see enough access to buses, Em-X, etc so I can eliminate the use of my car. <br /> Probably also a good idea. <br /> Pretty similar to C but more expensive (and lower expected ridership?), looks like most of that <br />cost is for 30th ave. Not a bad option to get ahead of the curve, but support for need in the <br />future might be tricky to get. If you can, then go for it. <br /> Positive: Systemwide Annual Ridership Increase, New Bike/Ped Access and Safety Improvements <br /> Less Ideal: Capital Cost <br /> My most-preferred option is the all-EmX option, but I understand that such a big project could <br />be unsettling to folks for many reasons, therefore I think that this option is the best one that <br />could get broad community support. I think that this option could be seen as one more step on <br />the way to implementing the all-EmX system in the future. <br /> Most bang for the buck. Addresses all areas. <br /> More equitable transit access throughout the community. <br /> Looks great. If the EmX option is determined to be too expensive/displacing this looks like a <br />significant upgrade. <br /> Like greater investment in enhanced corridors on high traffic corridors such as 30th and Coburg <br />Rd. Includes one EMX option in high priority area and has possibility of increasing ridership. <br />Getting closer to being consistent with local goals. <br /> It's what we really need. I hope people start to understand this. <br /> It sounds like a good idea <br /> It makes sense <br /> It isn't much more than the others (except no build), so I don't really understand why those are <br />even still on the table. <br /> If all my wishes could be fulfilled, I would have this plan, please. <br /> I think this option does the most good for a reasonable amount of money. Obviously the last <br />option yields the highest results but this option appears to offer a much higher value. We need <br />to be responsible with tax payer dollars. I think this would be a great plan that is achievable. <br /> i think this is the most balanced option. <br /> I think Package C strikes a good balance with all criteria as I understand it, and improvements for <br />the most routes. I live in the River Road area and would DEFINITELY take the EmX if it was <br />offered out there. The Park/Ride takes too long to be realistic for my workplace at UO. <br /> I think it's the most efficient of what I've read and affects the most areas in a positive way. <br /> I like the package, I don't know that it is worth the jump from Package B to Package C in cost for <br />not much of an increase in relative outcomes. <br /> I don't support EmX going out River Road. I do support improvements to Hwy 99, Coburg, and <br />LCC. <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1