Laserfiche WebLink
MovingAhead Spring 2019 Outreach Summary 64 <br />Coburg Road, and so on). The description here of effort needed for Enhanced Corridor vs EmX <br />Line makes it sound like this should make sense? <br /> Any thing that is pricey is a concern to me, yet sometimes big investments now save getting big <br />headaches later. As you folks need to plan several years into an ever-increasingly uncertain <br />future, I applaud your efforts. I feel sad I wasn't able to give much to the conversation as LTD is <br />such an important service and social connection to me. <br /> A little bit better than plan B in terms of bike and ped safety. Your ratings don't address how <br />often buses would come, which is more important than how long they take to get somewhere. <br /> A good balance. Investment on all 5 corridors. Easier to implement and maintain (and pay for). <br />EmX <br />Concerns <br />Cost <br />Too much <br /> While better biking and walking safety, costs and development impacts too high. EmX seems not <br />to provide that much more benefit than more frequently occuring buses. <br /> Way, way, way too expensive!!!! <br /> Way too expensive, ridership increase is not realistic, <br /> Very high cost to maintain system and build <br /> Very expensive for not much improvement over Plan C. <br /> Too much investment <br /> Too expensive. Not best allocation of limited resources. Instead should invest in improved <br />pedestrian environments on WEEE from downtown to Garfield, as well as South Willamette <br />Street. <br /> Too expensive. <br /> Too expensive, impact on landscape, existing parking. Too much. <br /> Too expensive to build EmX on four corridors <br /> Too costly. EMX not needed on Coburg. <br /> To much money <br /> To much focus on expensive EMX and those corridors <br /> This plan is just too expensive. It also would have a huge impact on trees and property. I think a <br />lot of people would feel bad about this plan for those reasons. <br /> This is yet another example of the planners over engineering for a need that has not developed. <br />A waste of tax payer money at both a local and federal level. <br /> This is way too much to spend on EMX and its unnecessary to have EMX everywhere. <br /> Seems too expensive for outcome relative to option C <br /> Probably over kill on EmX. <br /> Ouch the price, we do need it, but ouch the price. <br /> It's too expensive! You don't have the money. Too many business disrupted. Too long to <br />complete project. You know it will go over budget and over time constraints. I don't ever want <br />to see an EmX down Coburg road. If it gets approved, I'm leaving Oregon. <br /> Why not take a different approach and look into building a monorail.. Small footprint. <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1