Laserfiche WebLink
<br />May 2019 Investment Package Alternatives MovingAhead <br />8 Supplemental Refinement Report <br />Enhanced Corridor and especially Package A drew more expressions of concern than of approval. For <br />Package A, the emphasis on serving low-income areas was a recurring topic of both concern and <br />approval. For both Enhanced Corridor and Package A, frequently expressed concerns include relatively <br />low improvements in travel time, ridership rates, and safety for people walking and biking. <br /> <br />Figure 2.1 Community Opinion - How Well Proposed Investment Packages Work <br /> <br />Source: JLA, 2019. <br /> <br />In summary, concerns and support expressed about each of the investment packages as well as general <br />comments are summarized below in Tables 2.1 through 2.5. <br /> <br />37% <br />22% <br />47% 47% 46% <br />50% <br />62% <br />40% 41% 44% <br />14% 15% 13% 11% 10% <br />0% <br />10% <br />20% <br />30% <br />40% <br />50% <br />60% <br />70% <br />Enhanced Corridor Package A Package B Package C EmX <br />Works Well + Works OK Major Concerns + Some Concerns Neutral - Not Sure <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1