Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MovingAhead Investment Package Alternatives May 2019 <br /> Supplemental Refinement Report 17 <br />Package B <br />When looking at the top five criteria most important in evaluating proposed packages based on how the <br />participant rated Package B, the list of most important criteria changes (Table 2.9 and Figure 2.5). For <br />the 93 participants who said that Package B “Works Well” or “Works OK”, the most important criteria <br />were New Bike/Ped Access and Safety Improvements followed by Ridership Increase, Percent of <br />Investment in Corridors with Higher Level of Disadvantage Population, Travel Time Improvement, and <br />Operating Cost. For the 78 participants who said that they had “Some Concerns” or “Major Concerns” <br />about Package B, the most important criteria were Capital Cost followed by New Bike / Ped Access and <br />Safety Investments, Operating Cost, Ridership Increase, and Travel Time Improvement. <br /> <br />Table 2.9 Top Five Criteria Most Important in Evaluating Proposed Investment Package B by <br />Package Rating <br /> <br />Works Well / <br />Works OK <br />Some Concerns / <br />Major Concerns <br />Neutral Not Sure Total <br /># Participants 93 78 21 4 196 <br />Operating Cost 9% 11% 10% 0% 10% <br />Capital Cost 9% 13% 6% 20% 10% <br />Travel Time Improvement 11% 7% 14% 10% 10% <br />Ridership Increase 12% 9% 9% 10% 10% <br />Bike / Ped Investments 14% 12% 16% 30% 14% <br />Support Development 7% 5% 3% 10% 6% <br />Tree Impacts 7% 6% 8% 0% 7% <br />Acquisitions 4% 5% 1% 0% 4% <br />Business Relocations 3% 8% 4% 0% 5% <br />Parking Impacts 3% 5% 3% 10% 4% <br />EJ 11% 6% 14% 0% 10% <br />Public Support 6% 7% 6% 10% 6% <br />Local Plans Consistency 6% 6% 8% 0% 6% <br />Source: JLA, 2019 <br /> <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1