Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MovingAhead Investment Package Alternatives May 2019 <br /> Supplemental Refinement Report 19 <br />Package C <br />When looking at the top five criteria most important in evaluating proposed packages based on how the <br />participant rated Package C, the list of most important criteria changes (Table 2.10 and Figure 2.6). For <br />the 93 participants who said that Package C “Works Well” or “Works OK”, the most important criteria <br />were New Bike/Ped Access and Safety Improvements followed by Ridership Increase, Travel Time <br />Improvement, Percent of Investment in Corridors with Higher Level of Disadvantage Population, and <br />Operating Cost. For the 81 participants who said that they had “Some Concerns” or “Major Concerns” <br />about Package C, the most important criteria were Capital Cost followed by Operating Cost, New Bike / <br />Ped Access and Safety Investments, Business Relocations, and Tree Impacts. <br /> <br />Table 2.10 Top Five Criteria Most Important in Evaluating Proposed Investment Package C by <br />Package Rating <br /> <br />Works Well / <br />Works OK <br />Some Concerns / <br />Major Concerns <br />Neutral Not Sure Total <br /># Participants 93 81 17 5 196 <br />Operating Cost 10% 12% 4% 0% 10% <br />Capital Cost 7% 14% 7% 17% 10% <br />Travel Time Improvement 11% 7% 16% 0% 10% <br />Ridership Increase 12% 6% 15% 0% 10% <br />Bike / Ped Investments 16% 10% 16% 25% 14% <br />Support Development 8% 3% 7% 8% 6% <br />Tree Impacts 6% 9% 3% 17% 7% <br />Acquisitions 1% 7% 1% 0% 4% <br />Business Relocations 2% 9% 0% 8% 5% <br />Parking Impacts 3% 6% 3% 8% 4% <br />EJ 11% 8% 13% 8% 10% <br />Public Support 5% 7% 4% 8% 6% <br />Local Plans Consistency 8% 3% 9% 0% 6% <br />Source: JLA, 2019 <br /> <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1