Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MovingAhead Investment Package Alternatives May 2019 <br /> Supplemental Refinement Report 21 <br />EmX Package <br />When looking at the top five criteria most important in evaluating proposed packages based on how the <br />participant rated the EmX Package, the list of most important criteria changes (Table 2.11 and Figure <br />2.7). For the 105 participants who said that the EmX Package “Works Well” or “Works OK”, the most <br />important criteria were New Bike/Ped Access and Safety Improvements followed by Ridership Increase, <br />Travel Time Improvement, Percent of Investment in Corridors with Higher Level of Disadvantage <br />Population, and Consistency with Local Plans. For the 99 participants who said that they had “Some <br />Concerns” or “Major Concerns” about the EmX Package, the most important criteria were Capital Cost <br />and Operating Cost (tied) followed by New Bike / Ped Access and Safety Investments, Tree Impacts and, <br />Percent of Investment in Corridors with Higher Level of Disadvantage Population. <br /> <br />Table 2.11 Top Five Criteria Most Important in Evaluating Proposed EmX Investment Package by <br />Package Rating <br /> <br />Works Well / <br />Works OK <br />Some Concerns / <br />Major Concerns <br />Neutral Not Sure Total <br /># Participants 105 99 17 5 226 <br />Operating Cost 7% 13% 14% 5% 10% <br />Capital Cost 5% 13% 20% 10% 10% <br />Travel Time Improvement 13% 7% 6% 10% 10% <br />Ridership Increase 13% 7% 4% 0% 10% <br />Bike / Ped Investments 18% 10% 10% 5% 14% <br />Support Development 8% 4% 4% 0% 6% <br />Tree Impacts 4% 9% 6% 15% 7% <br />Acquisitions 1% 5% 8% 20% 4% <br />Business Relocations 1% 7% 8% 20% 5% <br />Parking Impacts 2% 6% 2% 15% 4% <br />EJ 12% 8% 6% 0% 9% <br />Public Support 6% 7% 8% 0% 6% <br />Local Plans Consistency 9% 3% 2% 0% 6% <br />Source: JLA, 2019 <br /> <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1