My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 10/23/06 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2006
>
CC Minutes - 10/23/06 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:32:09 AM
Creation date
1/11/2007 11:30:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/23/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilor Solomon, seconded by Councilor Ortiz, moved to direct the City Manager to <br />prepare an ordinance to create a sustainability commission as a standing committee advi- <br />sory to the City Council. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon did not feel that the council had fleshed out, as a group, what this commission would <br />do, how it would be created, and how much it would cost. She believed it would be more appropriate to do <br />this in the council priorities session. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly did not think the motion established the sustainability commission, rather it just directed <br />staff to draft the ordinance. He believed, in terms of the SBI recommendations, the sustainability <br />commission and the office of sustainability were the “linchpins” to make anything in the report move <br />forward. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly, seconded by Councilor Bettman, moved to amend the motion to add a <br />second sentence, as follows: <br />“The ordinance will describe a 12-member commission in which each councilor ap- <br />points a single member, and the remaining four members would be chosen by the full <br />council.” <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly explained that he felt there were lots of different ways to gather applicants for a board. He <br />said the amendment would put this model for gaining applicants in the draft ordinance, which could <br />ultimately be reworked. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman supported the amendment and the motion. She agreed with Councilor Kelly’s <br />comments. She said this motion would give direction to staff to craft language that would later be vetted <br />through a public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor expressed some hesitation over the “seeming speed” at which this was setting the <br />mechanisms in place. He said he would support the motion, however. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling echoed Councilor Pryor’s hesitation. He believed that specific direction should come out <br />after the goal-setting session. He agreed that this was circumventing the process that was in place and said <br />he would not support the amended motion. <br /> <br />Councilor Papé asked if the ordinance would be preceded by a work session. City Manager Taylor replied <br />that an ordinance required a public hearing. He said the motion did not speak to a work session and none <br />was planned at the time. <br /> <br />Councilor Papé offered a friendly amendment to require a work session on the ordinance <br />language. Councilor Kelly accepted the friendly amendment, as did the second. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly disagreed that this had been a speedy process, given that it had been well over a year to get <br />the SBI report to this point. He said in terms of being vetted through the normal processes, this had been <br />through the previous year’s Budget Committee process. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 23, 2006 Page 6 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.