My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2: PH on Resolution Adopting Amended SDC Methodology and Rates
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 01/16/07 Public Hearing
>
Item 2: PH on Resolution Adopting Amended SDC Methodology and Rates
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:22:42 PM
Creation date
1/11/2007 11:45:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/16/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />other parameter not represented by BOD or 1SS such as screenings, grit, or pathogens? <br />These questions are answered by the functional performance component. The design basis <br />co~~ders what system capacity parameter or combination of parameters drives the sizing of <br />the facility and, therefore; the constructed cost. The allocation basis for each.facility <br />. component presented in. Table 3 combines both the functional performance and design basis <br />considerations. In addition. to these system parameters, because there can be proJec:;ts. that <br />provide overall support-for the wastewater system, a separate catego~ of lIindirect" <br />. support facilities is used to provide for reallocation of these support-type. costs across all of <br />the system capacity parameters. . <br /> <br />TABLE 3 <br />Summary of Facility Process Component Allocation to System Capacity Parameters <br /> <br /> System Capacity 'Parameter <br /> Average Peak <br />Facility Process Component Flow Flow BOD TSS Indirect Total <br />Collection system pipeline % ~ 1 <br />Collection system pump stations % ~ 1 <br />Preliminary treatment % ~. 1 <br />Primary treatment % % % '1 <br />Secon~ary treatment % % % 1 <br />Disinfection/outfall % ~ l' . <br />Biosolids (same for all three subcomponents) % % - 1 <br />Tertiary fjlters % % % 1 <br />Reuse .facilities 1 1 <br />Odor control % % 1 <br />Peak flow management 1 1 <br />Support facilities (Indirects) 1 1 <br /> <br />Step Two · .Growth Capacity Requirements <br /> <br />In developing SDCs, costs related' to growth (see 'Cost Basis' below).are spread over <br />. growth's total ,capacity requirements over the study period to determine the overall cost per <br />unit of growth by capacity measure. The. study period is defiited asa 20-year period, <br />consistent with facility planning requirements. The Department of Environmental Quality <br />(DEQ) stipulates that entities that own and operate wastewater facilities assume a 20-year <br />pla.mUng horizon when developing facility plans (see DEQ Guidance for Development of <br />Wastewater Facilities Plans, 20(0). <br /> <br />To determine the capacity required by growth, the capacity required by exi~ting users is <br />subtracted from the capac;ity projected in the facility plan to be required at the end of the <br />planning period. For peak flow estimates, existing users' current capacity requirements are <br />adjusted for anticipated III reductions (see Guidelines for the Preparation of Facilities PlanS <br />and Environmental Reports for Community Wastewater Projects, 1999). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.