My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2: PH on Resolution Adopting Amended SDC Methodology and Rates
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 01/16/07 Public Hearing
>
Item 2: PH on Resolution Adopting Amended SDC Methodology and Rates
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:22:42 PM
Creation date
1/11/2007 11:45:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/16/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Biosolids facilities at the WPCF and the BMF are both sized and function to treat the BOD <br />and TSS removed during the treatment process; therefore, their allocation is split equally' <br />between BOD and TSS. <br /> <br />. BOO"- 1/2 <br />. 'TSS - 1/2 <br /> <br />Tertiary Filters <br /> <br />The existing WPCF does not have tertiary filters. The"20-year project list recommends that <br />te~ary filters be installed to enable the wP~F to consistently meet the NPDES permit <br />discharge requirements. The permit includ~s mass limits for BOD and TSS. As influent <br />flows to the "WPCF increase in the future, the effluent concentration required to mee~ the <br />mass limits decreases. Addi~on of the filters will assist with meeting these more stringent <br />effluent concentrations. From a f'u!lctional basis, the main purpose of the filters is to remove <br />TSS, and-toa lesser degree BOD. From a design criteria siZing basis, average flow is used to <br />determine the size of the facilities. In the wet weather season, a portion of the peak flow " <br />may be routed to the filters for ~dditianal treatment. HoweveJ;, the "ass~ted peak flow <br />, loadirig rate onto the filters will not be the lliriiting factor interms of design criteria sizing~ <br />Following is the .allocation for the tertiary filter treatment category: . <br /> <br />. Average Flow -1/4 <br />." BOD -1/4 <br />. "TSS-1/2" <br /> <br />Reuse Facilities <br /> <br />'Reuse facilities maybe constrUcted to comply with more stringent regulatory requirements <br />related to temperature and/ or thermal load restrictions of Willalnette ,River discharges. <br />" Reuse facilities would allow flow to be diverted from the river by reusing plant effluent for <br />irrigation. The basic design criterion used ~o size reuse facilities is average flow; so this <br />parameter receives 100 percent of the all~ation. " <br /> <br />. Average Flow -100percent <br /> <br />QdQr Control <br /> <br />Odor control facilities function by collecting odorous air from preliminary 1 primary liquids <br />treatment processes and biosolids treatment/" handling processes and treating the air to <br />remove the "odors. Odor generation is dependent on the influent loading levels and, <br />therefore; the allocatio~ is split equally between BOD and TSS because both parameters <br />contribute ~o the slzingand function of the odor control systems. <br /> <br />. BOD - 1/2 <br />. TSS-1/2 <br /> <br />Peak Flow Management <br /> <br />There are a number of future capital improvement projects that specifically function to <br />convey, treat, and "discharge the wet season peak flow. For example, the parallel <br />primary / secondary peak flow management approach is proposed solely to address peak <br /> <br />A-25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.