Laserfiche WebLink
<br />technology such as pers <br />promise to make such ef <br /> <br />Commercial and NGO rtnerships. If there are non-governmental agencies in <br />the community that relia inventory land use or track commercial development, <br />the region could explore a angements for obtaining supplemental data and <br />independent data verific ton services. <br /> <br /> <br />I data assistants (PDAs) that have GIS capability <br />s easier in the future. <br /> <br />LAND INVENTORY OPTIONS <br /> <br /> <br />The project prov.d: d a preliminary assessment of the supply of <br />commercial and ind s' ialland in the Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth <br />Boundary. There ar an,y options that could be pursued, but the first <br />question is whether r'not to extend this project State law, prudent planning, <br />and local conflicts is es (between Eugene and Springfield, among elected <br />officials in the same verning body, and among various interest groups) <br />strongly suggest the ed for a land needs analysis for the Metro area. Though <br />the costs (direct and litical) of such a study are large, the costs of not <br />addressing these iss e are larger. At risk are regional partnerships on land use <br />planning and econo i. development, and relationships between local <br />government and bus. ss. Without a comprehensive evaluation and decision, <br />the land supply issu ill continue to be an issue for all jurisdictions and will <br />inhibit other efforts t i~proving regional cooperation quality of life in the <br />region by t~king tim nd resources away from other efforts, and by failing to <br />provide a framewor r future private and public development. <br /> <br />Proceeding with I the sponsoring agencies will require the approval of <br />policy assumptions, ciding if the project should be expanded to include <br />residential land, dev I ping land demand estimates and comparing the supply <br />with the demand. <br /> <br />There are severa <br /> <br /> <br />ptions; four are discussed below: <br /> <br />t the current project. Let the elected officials of each <br />n and how they will proceed with land inventories. <br />es the cooperative efforts of the sponsoring <br />ould result in a project that will cease to be useful for <br />e. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Option 1. Close <br />agency decide w <br />This option miti <br />jurisdictions and <br />its intended purp <br /> <br />. Option 2. Coop r te, identify and fund the next steps of the commercial <br />and industrialla s study. The continued cooperative efforts could result <br />in a useful datab e useable by all agencies for the intended purpose of the <br />project. The fun ng to support this option is not designated and <br />depending on th ost could be a deterrent in selecting this option. <br /> <br />. Option 3. Coop r., te, design and schedule an expanded land needs study. <br />This option coul xpand the study to include residential lands. A land <br />needs study coulbe useful for all sponsoring j1.;lrisdictions however, some <br />are already in va .. us stages of such a study. Cooperatively funding such <br /> <br />Commercial and Industrial Lands Database <br /> <br />ECONorthwest <br /> <br />September 2006 <br /> <br />Page 22 <br />