Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Furber stated the review confirmed that the City of Eugenes assessment of the current condition of the <br />= <br />pavement as rated through the Citys pavement management system was on track. He said the study <br />= <br />concluded there needed to be some adjustment in the unit prices for pavement rehab work, and the effect <br />of that adjustment was a slight increase in unit prices. Mr. Furber explained that the City had an excellent <br />data base of how pavements performed over time,and that these pavements had an expected life 37 <br />percent longer than what had been modeled in the software and, therefore, would cost less to maintain. He <br />commented there was a more effective way of allocating maintenance dollars by using a sub-budget for the <br />arterial overlays, the residential overlays, etc. <br />Mr. Furber referred to page 5 of the review - Exhibit 1, Comparison of Effect of Budget Allocation on <br />Deferred Work Backlog, as follows: <br />Estimated backlog after 10 years with no additional funding - $231,500,000 <br />Estimated backlog after 10 years with $8.5 million Annual Budget Prioritized Best First in Single <br />A@ <br />Budget - $56,600,000 <br />Estimated backlog after 10 years with $6.5 million Annual Budget Prioritized by Sub-budgets - <br />$55,100,000 <br />Estimated backlog after 10 years with $8.5 million Annual Budget Prioritized by Sub-budgets - <br />$40,100,000 <br />Mr. Furber summarized that the Citys work with the pavement condition assessment was on target, and the <br />= <br />result of the findings of his analysis was that the additional cost could be attributed to the delay in funding <br />and, if it were not for that fact, the backlog in 2011 would be the same as the City had estimated: namely, <br />MINUTES- Citizen Subcommittee of the Budget Committee September 19, 2001Page 2 <br />