My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Funding Strategies for Transportation System Operations, Maintenance, and Preservation
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 01/22/07 Work Session
>
Item B: Funding Strategies for Transportation System Operations, Maintenance, and Preservation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:13:19 PM
Creation date
1/18/2007 9:17:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/22/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Primary areas of operating Road Fund expenditures, along with FY02 gross budget estimates, include the <br />following elements: <br />Signs, signal and street light maintenance..................................$1.9 million <br />Asphalt and concrete...................................................$1.4 million <br />Trees, landscaping, irrigation and natural resources..........................$1.2 million <br />Planning and engineering...............................................$1.0 million <br />Administrativeservices.................................................$1.0 million <br />Technical services (including public information, permits and inspections)........$0.6 million <br />Other...............................................................$0.6 million <br />Total...............................................................$7.7 million <br /> projects go beyondroutine Operations and maintenance and provide major repairs <br />Preservation <br />C <br />at focused points in the system.Preservation projects typically are divided into two categories: <br />rehabilitation and reconstruction. <br /> in the form of overlays, slurry seals and other surface preventative maintenance <br />Rehabilitation <br />treatments is critical because deterioration and associated repair costs accelerate over time. The <br />chart on the following page (Figure 1) shows the general relationship between pavement age, <br />condition, preservation type, and cost. As a general rule, reconstructing a street that has failed <br />due to delayed preservation is four to five times more costly than rehabilitation. Staff estimates <br />it would cost approximately$3.2 million a year to provide timely rehabilitation on Eugene?s <br />streets. This amount is separate from ongoing operation and maintenance requirements. <br />Reconstruction <br /> describes projects in which the street structure typically is removed and rebuilt. <br />There are a number of reasons that have led to the accelerated deterioration of a large number of <br />Eugene?s street surfaces. Pavement age is one important reason. Studies have shown that the <br />typical life of arterial and collector pavement surfaces fall in the range from 12 to 15 years. <br />Once pavements pass that point, they tend to fail much more quickly (see Figure 1 on following <br />page), resulting in much higher costs to preserve the investment. An analysis done in 2000 by <br />PublicWorksshowed that almost half (48.4%) of Eugene?s arterial-collector street system is <br />more than 15 years old, and more than 70% of the system is more than 10 years old (see <br />Street <br />, Appendix C). <br />Age Map <br />Eugene?s reconstruction liability is growing. In 1994, approximately7% of Eugene?s arterial- <br />collector system was in need of reconstruction. By 1999, that figure had more than doubled, to <br />over 16%. As the system continues to age, and maintenance is delayed, more and more of the <br />system will deteriorate to the point of needing reconstruction. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.